Highlights

• CSIS correctly identifies heavy rare earths as the global choke point and Saudi Arabia's genuine strategic ambition.
• Treats ministry-supplied estimates as bankable geology when Jabal Sayid remains an unproven copper mine without JORC or NI 43-101 compliant REE resources.
• The MP-Ma'aden refinery joint venture faces critical unresolved hurdles:
  • No published flowsheet
  • No engineering design
  • No timeline to production
  • Unproven heavy REE separation capabilities
• Makes near-term claims of reshaping global refining overly optimistic.
• The partnership risks creating new dependency rather than diversification as every ton refined in Saudi Arabia is a ton not refined in the U.S.
• Potentially transforms 'friendshoring' into long-term strategic offshoring while midstream jobs and technical know-how move offshore.

---

When Center for Strategic & International Studies (opens in a new tab) (CSIS) describes (opens in a new tab) the new U.S.–Saudi minerals partnership as a “realignment” that will “directly reduce China’s leverage,” it is speaking the language Washington wants to hear. You know, that narrative thing.  And Gracelin Baskaran’s analysis—sharp, articulate, and well-researched—captures why heavy rare earths, Saudi capital, and civil nuclear cooperation matter.

But in the rush to cast this moment as a minerals-for-nuclear sequel to the 1945 oil-for-security pact, CSIS leans heavily on aspiration as if it were established geology and built midstream infrastructure. That’s where Rare Earth Exchanges (REEx) parts ways.

Where CSIS Gets It Right

CSIS deserves real credit where its analysis is grounded and compelling. It correctly identifies heavy rare earths as the global choke point, noting that Beijing’s leverage hinges on its dominance in dysprosium and terbium—materials embedded in everything from F-35s and submarines to radar systems and precision-guided munitions. It also recognizes that Saudi Arabia is serious, capital-rich, and moving quickly; Vision 2030, accelerated permitting, expanding exploration budgets, and the headline $2.5 trillion minerals endowment reflect genuine strategic ambition rather than PR varnish.

CSIS is equally right to spotlight energy economics: rare earth separations are energy-intensive, and Saudi Arabia’s ultra-low solar and wind LCOEs give it a real midstream cost advantage. Finally, its emphasis on civil nuclear cooperation is well taken—linking uranium resources, alternatives to Russian and Chinese enrichment, and Saudi baseload power to future minerals processing is strategically sound. On the fundamental question of why Saudi Arabia matters and why heavy REEs matter, CSIS is firmly on solid ground.

Where the Story Gets Ahead of the Drill Bit

Where REEx parts ways with CSIS is in how confidently the think tank treats ministry-supplied optimism as if it were bankable geology. CSIS leans heavily on Saudi government estimates that paint Jabal Sayid deposit as a rare earth treasure chest—552,000 tons of heavy REEs and another 355,000 tons of lights—elevating it to one of the world’s “four most valuable” rare earth deposits. It’s a striking claim, but one built on sand, not rock. In the real world, Jabal Sayid is—right now—a copper mine.

Barrick and Ma’aden’s own disclosures classify it as a VHMS copper operation with zinc credits, not a defined REE deposit, not a JORC resource, not NI 43-101 compliant, and not backed by metallurgical testwork or a mine plan.

And this is where the narrative drifts into fiction-by-extrapolation. “Value” is not a resource category, and ministry estimates are not substitutes for independent audits. A reminder to investors.  Saudi Arabia may well sit on meaningful REE potential—its geology is young in exploration terms, and the government is spending aggressively—but promoting Jabal Sayid as a top-tier global rare earth asset today is not analysis; it’s ambition masquerading as certainty.

Rare Earth Exchanges sticks with the disciplined framing: Saudi’s rare earth base is promising but unproven—anyone claiming otherwise is getting ahead of the drill bit.

The Refinery JV: Diversification or Distant Mirage?

CSIS accurately summarizes the deal mechanics:

• Ma’aden holds 51%
• The U.S. (via the Department of War) funds America’s 49%
• MP Materials supplies technical expertise
• The refinery will operate in Saudi Arabia, leveraging cheap energy and multiple feedstock sources

That is correct.

Where the analysis overreaches is in its conclusion that the JV will “reshape rare earth refining” and “reduce dependence on China” in the near term.

For that to be true, several hurdles must be cleared:

1. Saudi rare earth resources must progress from ministry estimates to bankable reserves.
2. Heavy REE flowsheets—especially Dy/Tb—must be developed, piloted, and scaled.
3. The refinery must secure consistent non-Chinese feedstock at industrial volumes.
4. Th expertise, know-how and established infrastructure must arrive at scale.

None of these conditions are yet proven.

As REEx previously noted, the project is operationally nascent:

• No published flowsheet
• No engineering design
• No declared throughput
• No timeline to first rare earth oxide
• No clarity on Saudi vs imported feedstock

CSIS’s framing underestimates how many steps lie between a Crown Prince handshake and a shipment of separated Dy₂O₃ leaving a Saudi port.

Friendshoring or Strategic Offshoring?

Both CSIS and REEx agree: Saudi Arabia could become a powerful processing hub, particularly for African feedstock.

Where REEx applies sharper scrutiny is the question Washington avoids:

Are we building a new dependency?

• Every ton refined in Saudi Arabia is a ton not refined in the United States (and the market trend, due to U.S. spending, has been a migration to America for such midstream activity).
• The U.S. is financing its equity share while midstream jobs and technical know-how accrue offshore.
• “Friendshoring” can quietly morph into long-term strategic offshoring—especially if U.S. permitting timelines remain 7–10 years and domestic opposition stiffens.

CSIS acknowledges Saudi’s faster permitting and U.S. delays—but stops short of addressing the underlying risk: the JV may deepen midstream reliance, just with a different partner.

Verdict: Strong Analysis, Overconfident Arc

Gracelin Baskaran delivers a thoughtful, well-written assessment of the geopolitical stakes behind U.S.–Saudi minerals cooperation. On energy, Vision 2030, and Saudi’s processing ambitions, she is compelling.

Where Rare Earth Exchanges parts company is in the degree of certainty layered onto:

• Saudi Arabia’s unproven REE geology
• The MP–Ma’aden refinery’s heavy REE ambitions
• The assumed inevitability of Saudi-led refining diversification
• The notion that this JV will materially reduce Chinese dominance in the near term

Saudi Arabia is a rising mineral power—no question. But glowing policy narratives should not be mistaken for geology, metallurgy, or project execution.

At Rare Earth Exchanges, we call this deal what it currently is:

Strategically interesting. Politically valuable. Technically early. Operationally unproven.

A headline moment, yes—but the ore body, the flowsheet, and the refinery must still catch up to the diplomacy.

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain