Highlights

• FPISC added 49 mining projects to FAST-41 since March under Trump's executive order.
• Only a handful of these projects have rare earth relevance.
• None of the projects produce magnet-grade NdPr or critical heavy REEs like dysprosium and terbium.
• The project list is dominated by copper, gold, lithium, and uranium.
• These minerals are important but do not solve America's dependency on China for rare earth magnet supply chains.
• FAST-41 improves permitting transparency and timeline predictability.
• FAST-41 does not guarantee approvals or address state-level permitting and litigation that delay rare earth projects.

---

The Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council (opens in a new tab) (FPISC) announced that 50 mining and critical mineral projects now sit under FAST-41 benefits—forty-nine of them added since March under President Trump’s Executive Order to accelerate U.S. mineral production. On paper, this is a significant expansion of America’s mining project pipeline.

But Rare Earth Exchanges readers know the real question: How many of these projects meaningfully advance U.S. rare earth or heavy rare earth capacity? The answer, based on current disclosures, is: very few.

The press release frames the portfolio as foundational to “battery production, military defense, electricity generation, and medicinal purposes.” While directionally true—many listed minerals are part of modern supply chains—the majority of projects are not rare earth projects. The list is dominated by copper, gold, coal, uranium, phosphate, potash, and titanium. These are important, but they do not solve America’s rare earth dependency, particularly its crippling shortage of dysprosium and terbium.

Parsing the Claims: What’s Accurate vs. Aspirational

The Permitting Council’s claim that the “average mining permit previously took 29 years” is not technically accurate. Individual cases have stretched decades—Pebble, Resolution Copper, Roca Honda—but 29 years is an extreme high-end anecdote, not a statistical average. Investors should treat the number as political framing, not empirical fact.

FAST-41 coverage does materially help with timeline predictability. That part is valid. But it does not guarantee approvals, and it does not solve state-level permitting, community opposition, or environmental litigation—which are, in practice, the real timeline drivers for rare earth projects.

Rare Earth Reality Check: Which Projects Actually Matter?

Among the 50, only a handful contain meaningful rare earth relevance:

• Graphite Creek (AK) – impacts anode supply, not REEs.
• South32 Hermosa – zinc/manganese; critical, but not REEs.
• Tonopah Flats Lithium – strategic lithium, not REEs.
• Kings Mountain Lithium Processing – again, lithium, not REEs.
• Resolution Copper / NorthMet / Stillwater / Warrior Met Coal – critical minerals, yes, but zero connection to rare earth magnet materials.
• Aqqaluk Pit, Caldwell Canyon, Stibnite Gold – important mineral sources, but no REE impact.

Notably absent: any project producing magnet-grade NdPr, or critical heavy rare earths like Dy/Tb. No Mountain Pass expansion. No Round Top (TX). No Bear Lodge (WY). No Ucore (AK). No Energy Fuels monazite circuits. The portfolio expands U.S. mining broadly—but does not materially shift America’s rare earth trajectory.

Bottom Line: Progress, But Not a Rare Earth Strategy

FPISC’s milestone is real. Permitting transparency improves. Mining projects move faster. But framing this as a breakthrough for America’s rare earth independence is overstated. Until FAST-41 actively shepherds rare earth separation, monazite processing, and heavy-REE extraction, the U.S. remains dependent on China for the magnet supply chain that powers EVs, defense systems, and robotics.

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.