Highlights

• China controls 60-70% of rare earth mining and 90% of refining, with export restrictions providing geopolitical leverage.
• Deterministic narratives overlook accelerating Western supply chain development.
• U.S.-Australia partnerships, MP Materials, Lynas, and emerging processors are compressing timelines for mine-to-magnet capacity.
• These developments challenge claims that Western independence will take decades.
• Media framing that reinforces China's 'unbreakable' position may reflect strategic bias rather than supply chain reality.
• Investors should scrutinize narrative tone alongside actual data.

---

A Familiar Story, Told Loudly—And Why Investors Should Still Read Between the Lines

A new Economic Times report (opens in a new tab) declares—again—that “China holds a strong grip” on the global rare earths supply chain and is using that power to pressure the United States. The framing is dramatic: export restrictions, mine-to-magnet dominance, and President Trump threatening to cancel meetings with Xi over rare earth leverage. Little here is new. But the timing, tone, and selective sourcing deserve scrutiny—precisely why Rare Earth Exchanges exists.

The Facts That Matter: China Still Controls the Middle of the Chain

Let’s separate what is accurate from what is amplified.

Yes—China controls ~60–70% of mined supply and ~90% of global refining and separation, especially in heavy rare earths like dysprosium, terbium, and yttrium. Ganzhou’s ion-adsorption clay basin remains the world’s dominant HREE engine, and state consolidation—China Rare Earth Group, China Northern Rare Earth Group, and a few others have tightened command even further.

Yes—export restrictions rolled out in early October materially disrupted global buyers. That move does give Beijing political leverage, especially when Washington needs magnet metals for jets, missiles, and EVs.

And yes—the West’s “mine-to-magnet by 2027” ambition is still more aspiration than execution. Processing pipelines in the United States, Australia, Japan, and Malaysia remain incomplete.

These points are credible and consistent with REEx’s real-time tracking of supply, pricing, and geopolitics.

Where the Article Slips Into Spin: A Narrative of Inevitability

The Economic Times piece edges into deterministic storytelling—suggesting China’s dominance is unbreakable and that Western efforts will take “years” or “decades.” That is strategic fatalism, not data. The West is already compressing timelines:

– The U.S.–Australia $8.5B mineral initiative is real.

– MP Materials, Lynas, ReElement, Iluka, and Ucore, not to mention the highly promising Phoenix Tailings, are scaling separation capacity.

– Japan, India, and the EU are building joint stockpiles and magnet corridors.

The claim that the South Korea Trump–Xi meeting “neutralized U.S. measures” is speculative. Temporary access is not structural security. Now Rare Earth Exchanges is more cynical about supply chain resilience than Washington DC’s narrative, but we are hopeful and see momentum building.

The Tell: Narratives Reinforcing China’s Bargaining Power

The article subtly reinforces an old Asian media theme: China holds all the cards. That confidence alone is the bias. China’s position is strong—but not immutable. Myanmar’s instability, rising domestic costs, technology leakage concerns, and Western re-industrialization all complicate the picture.

Investors should treat deterministic language as a signal—not of China’s strength, but of the media ecosystem through which supply-chain narratives are shaped.

  © 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.