The Illusion of Calm: How Beijing and Washington Are Gaslighting the West Into Rare Earth Complacency

Nov 28, 2025

Highlights

  • China maintains unchallenged control over 90% of global rare earth refining and near-total dominance of heavy rare earths critical for defense and EVs, particularly from Ganzhou.
  • Despite US$8.5 billion Western investments and diplomatic truces, no viable heavy rare earth supply chain exists outside China, exposing a dangerous gap between political ambition and industrial reality.
  • Short-term trade agreements don't neutralize long-term supply risksโ€”investors must focus on who will supply dysprosium and terbium to Western defense programs before 2030.

A new AFP/Malay Mail report (opens in a new tab) paints a familiar picture: Chinaโ€™s decades-long rise to rare earth supremacy has become an economic weapon in the Sino-American trade war. The piece is broadly accurateโ€”but not complete. For Rare Earth Exchanges readers, the goal is to separate geopolitical theater from supply-chain reality, and to translate the headlines into investor-relevant clarity.

The Empire Built Quietly: Chinaโ€™s Heavy Rare Earth Stronghold

The report accurately confirms the industryโ€™s hard facts:

  • China controls ~66% of global mining, ~90% of global refining, and near-total separation for Dy, Tb, Y, and other heaviesโ€”critical for EV motors, radars, and aerospace systems.
  • Ganzhou remains the worldโ€™s most important source of heavy rare earths, as the AFP team witnessed trucks moving in and out of mines and processing plantsโ€”a rare window into an industry normally off-limits.

All of this aligns with REEx models: China remains unchallenged in heavy rare earth value chains. Western supply growth remains a light rare earth story for now.

Where the Story Drifts: The Trade War, the Truce, and the โ€œGuaranteed Supplyโ€ Narrative

Here, the article steps into softer ground. AFP frames Trumpโ€“Xiโ€™s one-year โ€œtruceโ€ as a guarantee of mineral supply. Investors should treat that language carefully.

Guarantees from China in strategic minerals are policy levers, not promises. Export restrictions in October already rattled global manufacturers, and Beijingโ€™s future decisions will be tactical, not contractual. The article is technically correct that China uses rare earths as a bargaining tool, but it overlooks that short-term truces do not neutralize long-term dependency risk.

This is the missing investor context.

And REEx notes that the media is somehow influenced by China, or for that matter, a victorious narrative out of Washington DC establishes an artificial and not necessarily accurate relaxation. More industrial policy is necessary in the West to achieve resilience of the supply chain within a decade.

Western Acceleration: Real Progress or Political Pageantry?

AFP notes major U.S. moves:

  • A US$8.5B critical minerals package with Australia.
  • New agreements with Japan, Malaysia, and Thailand.

    DoDโ€™s โ€œmine-to-magnet by 2027โ€ mandate (this is nearly certainly going to be extended)

All true. But the article avoids the harder question: Are these actions enough to break Chinaโ€™s monopoly? REExโ€™s assessment: not yet. Heavy rare earths remain unaddressed, and most Western projects still rely on Chinese separation technology or off-take channels.ย  The West needs a more comprehensive, durable, and integrated industrial policy.

What This Means for Investors: Interpret the Headlinesโ€”Donโ€™t Inhale Them

The AFP piece is accurate but incomplete. It describes Chinaโ€™s dominance; it underplays how deeply structural that dominance is. For rare earth investors, the real story is the widening gap between Western ambition and industrial execution.

Key unanswered questions:

  • Who will supply heavies (Dy/Tb) to U.S. defense programs between now and 2030?
  • What about all of the infrastructure necessary for true rebuilding of the supply chain (see our article on the Chip sector situation in Arizona)
  • How enforceable is a โ€œtruceโ€ in a commodity China controls 90% of?
  • Which Western projects can scale separation without Chinese technology?

These are the investment triggersโ€”not diplomatic headlines.

ยฉ 2025 Rare Earth Exchangesโ„ข โ€“ Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.

Search
Recent Reex News

Midstream Is the Moat: Why Standards and Licensing Matter as Much as Ore

From Intent to Infrastructure: India Steps Into the Allied Minerals Game

Rules Before Rocks: Brussels and Washington Try Again to Break the Minerals Logjam

Who Owns Malawi's Rare Earths? An Offshore Shuffle Raises Hard Questions for Investors

The Paradox of Visibility: Why Capital Chases AI-and Undervalues the Minerals That Power It

By Daniel

Inspired to launch Rare Earth Exchanges in part due to his lifelong passion for geology and mineralogy, and patriotism, to ensure America and free market economies develop their own rare earth and critical mineral supply chains.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.