Highlights

• Barkly Rare Earths is raising A$8M via IPO to drill its Tennant Creek project.
• The project comprises 40Mt @ 2,100ppm TREO in unconsolidated sands.
• The project has an impressive 714ppm magnet REE grade that exceeds some feasibility-stage peers.
• The loose sand geology offers potential low-cost mining advantages.
• Metallurgy remains unproven with no locked-cycle testing, detailed impurity data, or answers on acid consumption, radiation, and tailings management.
• Strong management team including Arafura's former MD Gavin Lockyer adds credibility.
• The project remains pre-metallurgical and embryonic—a speculative entry with high dilution risk requiring multiple future raises.

---

Barkly Rare Earths (opens in a new tab) is seeking A$8 million in a tightly timed IPO to drill out its Tennant Creek rare earth project—an early-stage discovery hosted in loose, unconsolidated beach-like sands containing 40Mt @ 2,100ppm TREO, including a notably high 34% magnet rare earth component. For a project at this stage, the magnet ratio is impressive: roughly 714ppm MREO, a grade that exceeds or matches the total REO grade of some peer projects with completed feasibility studies.

The geological twist—sediment-hosted REE mineralization across a potentially Shark Bay–scale basin—introduces meaningful upside. If deeper drilling confirms basin-wide consistency, geological risk could fall sharply. But today Barkly remains at the inferred-resource, shallow-aircore stage. Investors must separate early promise from verifiable progress.

A Low-Cost Mining Narrative—But Not Yet a Flow Sheet

Barkly highlights a key advantage: its ore is loose sand, requiring minimal crushing or blasting. If metallurgy proves that REEs can be liberated with low energy input, the project could deliver materially lower opex than clay-bound or hard-rock deposits. Early tests show 74% magnet REE recovery, but no locked-cycle testing or detailed impurity reporting has been disclosed.

Key questions for investors remain:

• What are the gangue minerals and expected acid/base consumptions?
• Can unconsolidated sediment maintain processing stability at scale?
• How will radiation, tailings, and water management be addressed in a basin-style footprint?
• Is the stated 700Mt expansion target a realistic geological scenario or aspirational marketing?

Until metallurgy matures, Barkly’s proposed cost advantages remain unproven.

Management Strength Is Real—But Cannot Replace Fundamentals

The board features Arafura’s former MD Gavin Lockyer and respected metallurgist Gavin Beer, both widely regarded in the sector. Their involvement lends credibility to Barkly’s technical ambitions—rare for a microcap IPO. Still, experience cannot compress the development timeline: Barkly remains a frontier-stage project that will demand time, capital, and careful derisking.

Valuation, Market Timing & Trump-Era Tailwinds

The raise—A$8m at 20c—positions Barkly to fund Stage 1 drilling. The company explicitly leans into the “Trump rare earth premium”, with U.S. policy accelerating global interest in magnet independence. But Barkly will almost certainly require multiple subsequent raises, and dilution risk is high.

From a technical standpoint, the company has no trading history, and valuation must be benchmarked against other pre-resource explorers. Fundamentally, the project is intriguing but embryonic.

Bottom Line: Real Potential, Real Risks, Real Early Stage

REEx assessment: Barkly presents a compelling geological concept and unusually strong management for an IPO, but it remains pre-metallurgical, pre-scale, and pre-economics. Investors should view the IPO as a speculative entry into a possibly significant NT rare earth basin—not a de-risked development story.

See the company prospectus (opens in a new tab).

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.