NdFeB Magnets and Great Powers Era 2.0: Why the World's Most Strategic Industrial Material Remains Vulnerable

Highlights

• China's dominance across rare earth mining, refining, and magnet manufacturing creates cascading supply chain vulnerabilities that Western economies have struggled to break.
• Researchers from University of Dundee and University of Queensland present a framework showing how geopolitics, geoeconomics, tech lock-in, and ESG pressures reinforce one another.
• Criticality is not an intrinsic property of rare earths—it emerges from the entire system surrounding them, requiring coordinated action across mining, policy, and finance.
• Upcoming 2027 DFARS mine-to-magnet restrictions and China's export controls underscore that NdFeB magnets have become strategic assets, not merely industrial products.
• Achieving supply chain resilience in the Great Powers Era 2.0 demands industrial planning at a scale Western economies have rarely attempted in the modern era.

In a timely new study, Alireza Valizadeh (opens in a new tab) of the University of Dundee, together with Vlado Vivoda of The University of Queensland and Thomas D.A. Jones of the University of Dundee, argue (opens in a new tab) that the vulnerabilities surrounding NdFeB (neodymium-iron-boron) magnets cannot be explained by mining, markets, technology, or ESG factors in isolation. Instead, the authors present a comprehensive framework showing how geopolitics, geoeconomics, technological constraints, and environmental-social governance (ESG) pressures interact to create systemic supply chain fragility. For Rare Earth Exchanges® readers, the paper reads almost like an academic validation of what we have long described as Great Powers Era 2.0—an emerging world in which industrial capacity, supply chain control, and critical minerals increasingly determine geopolitical influence and national power.

Alireza Valizadeh, PhD

Source: LinkedIn

Connecting the Dots

Rather than conducting new field research, the authors synthesized academic literature, government reports, and industry analyses to develop a conceptual model of NdFeB magnet supply chains. Their framework examines four interconnected forces: geopolitical concentration, geoeconomic pressures, technological lock-in, and ESG challenges. The central premise is that vulnerabilities do not exist independently—they cascade across the system and reinforce one another.

The Core Finding: Criticality Is a System-Level Problem

The study finds that China's dominance across rare earth mining, separation, refining, and magnet manufacturing creates leverage extending far beyond resource ownership alone. Geopolitical actions can trigger market volatility; volatile markets discourage long-term investment; weak investment slows recycling and substitution technologies; and ESG conflicts can delay or derail diversification projects. Together, these forces create a self-reinforcing cycle of dependency that has proven remarkably difficult for Western economies to break.

Where REEx Agrees—and Pushes Further

The framework aligns strongly with the REEx Great Powers Era 2.0 thesis. The authors correctly identify that supply chain resilience depends on the interaction of industrial policy, technology, capital formation, and social legitimacy, rather than any single intervention.

Where Rare Earth Exchanges would extend the analysis is in the growing role of national security policy. The study predates or only lightly addresses the strategic implications of China's recent export controls, Western defense-sector vulnerabilities, and the approaching 2027 DFARS mine-to-magnet restrictions that will require unprecedented supply chain traceability. These developments reinforce the paper's core thesis: magnets are no longer merely industrial products—they are strategic assets.

The Bottom Line

The most important contribution of this study is its conclusion that criticality is not an intrinsic property of rare earths or magnets. Rather, criticality emerges from the organization of the entire system surrounding them. Resilience will not come from a single mine, recycling facility, or government subsidy. It will require coordinated action across mining, processing, manufacturing, technology development, financing, trade policy, and governance.

In the Great Powers Era 2.0, the battle for magnets is increasingly a battle for industrial sovereignty itself. And such a movement necessitates planning on a scale the West is not used to in the modern era.

Citation: Valizadeh, A., Vivoda, V., & Jones, T.D.A. (2026). Supply Chains of NdFeB Magnets: A Conceptual Framework for Geopolitics, Geoeconomics, Technology, and ESG. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 100153. DOI: 10.1016/j.rset.2026.1001

Register today: REEx Marketplace™ (opens in a new tab)