Think Tank Sees a Dangerous Trade War. Great Powers Era 2.0 Sees Something Much Bigger

Highlights

• China's dominance in rare earths reflects a state-built ecosystem spanning mining, refining, manufacturing, and export licensing—not just market share.
• Western democracies face a closing window to rebuild resilient industrial capacity before critical supply chain dependence becomes irreversible.
• Investors relying on traditional globalization models risk missing the defining investment theme of the coming decade in critical minerals.
• Rare earth pricing and magnet production now respond more to industrial policy and national security priorities than to classical market forces.

Cullen S. Hendrix of the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) correctly argues (opens in a new tab) that today's U.S.-China trade conflict differs fundamentally from previous postwar trade disputes. His central insight—that intermediate goods such as rare earth magnets have become strategic weapons rather than ordinary commercial products—is among the article's strongest contributions.

But Rare Earth Exchanges® believes the analysis ultimately remains anchored in a globalization-era framework. Great Powers Era 2.0 begins with a different premise: this is no longer principally a trade war. It is an industrial mobilization contest over who controls the technologies, materials, manufacturing ecosystems, and geopolitical leverage defining the twenty-first century. This is in line with the Great Powers Era 2.0 thesis.

PIIE's institutional mission has historically emphasized liberalized trade, global integration, and multilateral economic governance. While the institute presents itself as nonpartisan, that intellectual tradition naturally predisposes its scholars toward viewing disrupted globalization primarily as an economic cost rather than, at times, a strategic necessity.

The article correctly highlights China's dominance in neodymium magnets, not to mention numerous other critical materials. Yet it understates the deeper reality. Beijing does not simply control market share—it has deliberately constructed an integrated, state-supported ecosystem spanning mining, separation, refining, alloying, magnet manufacturing, engineering talent, environmental permitting, financing, and export licensing. Rare earths are only one manifestation of a much broader industrial strategy cutting across all sorts of fundamental inputs for high-tech production, including defense and electric vehicles.

Great Powers Era 2.0 therefore reframes the question. The issue is not whether globalization is retreating. It already has in strategically critical sectors. The real question is whether Western democracies can rebuild resilient industrial capacity before supply chain dependence becomes irreversible.

For investors, this distinction matters enormously. Rare earth pricing, magnet production, and processing economics increasingly respond less to classical market forces than to industrial policy, national security priorities, export controls, and state-directed capital allocation.

That is not merely a trade dispute. It is the architecture of a new geopolitical economy.

Rare Earth Exchanges believes investors who continue analyzing critical minerals through traditional globalization models risk missing the defining investment theme of the coming decade.

Source: Cullen S. Hendrix, Peterson Institute for International Economics (June 29, 2026).

Register today: REEx Marketplace™ (opens in a new tab)