Highlights
- Historical TREO grades are eye-catching but date to 2013, with no modern reserve base or demonstrated supply chain to support a $62 billion valuation.
- Kenya's 2026 tender documents cite an inferred grade of 5.61% TREO versus the historically reported 3.61%, a two-percentage-point discrepancy with no public geological explanation.
- Winning the government tender is only the first step—separation, metal making, and magnet manufacturing determine whether Mrima creates a genuinely ex-China supply chain.
- Environmental sensitivity, the Digo community's cultural claims, thorium-bearing mineralization, and the legacy of the Cortec license revocation all pose material development risks.
- Kenya's strongest strategy may be leveraging U.S.-China competition to capture downstream processing value rather than simply exporting ore or concentrate.
0 Comments
No replies yet
Loading new replies...
Moderator
Join the full discussion at the Rare Earth Exchanges Forum →