Highlights
- Trump administration proposes 60% tariffs on Chinese rare earth imports to reduce dependency and boost domestic production.
- China’s dominant 70% market control could lead to potential export restrictions and supply chain disruptions.
- U.S. exploring strategic partnerships with allies like Australia to develop alternative rare earth processing capabilities.
Jennifer Kary (opens in a new tab), a “Content Marketer and SEO Strategist” for Metal Miner, recently authored “Rare Earths MMI: The Trump Transition and What to Expect for U.S. Rare Earth Imports,” (opens in a new tab) in what is likely a piece designed to drive more clicks. Published on January 7, 2025, MetalMiner is a reputable source for metal market analysis and pricing. In the article, the author examines the potential impact of President Donald Trump’s inauguration on rare earth imports in the U.S. It notes a 3.08% decline in the Rare Earths Monthly Metals Index (MMI) entering 2025, attributed to weak Chinese demand and significant changes in the global rare earth industry. Kary highlights the administration’s proposed tariffs—60% on Chinese imports and 10% on goods from other countries—as central to Trump’s trade policy, aiming to protect sectors vital to economic stability and national defense. She points out that China, controlling approximately 70% of the global rare earth market, may retaliate by restricting exports to the U.S., potentially disrupting supply chains and increasing costs for American industries reliant on these materials.
Kary also discusses the administration’s plans to reduce dependence on Chinese rare earth imports by bolstering domestic production and forming partnerships with allied nations like Australia. The author cites the collaboration between Australian firm Lynas Rare Earths and the U.S. Department of Defense to develop a processing plant in Texas as an example of efforts to enhance supply chain resilience and create jobs.
The article suggests combining higher tariffs and initiatives to expand domestic production presents a complex outlook for U.S. rare earth pricing. Initially, tariffs could raise costs by disrupting existing supply chains, but successful domestic production efforts might eventually stabilize or lower prices by reducing import dependence. Kary anticipates significant market volatility during the adjustment period as these policies and production capabilities evolve.
While Kary provides a decent overview of the potential implications of the Trump administration’s policies on the rare earth market, she assumes that the proposed tariffs and domestic production initiatives will proceed as planned without considering potential legal, environmental, or political challenges that could impede their implementation.
The author does not get into the timing of any transition to more U.S. refining. As Rare Earth Exchanges has put forth estimated timelines assuming large investment in the sector (including substantial government backing), the author’s cursory overview lacks depth and a critical edge.
Additionally, the article does not address the environmental concerns associated with rare earth mining and processing, which could influence policy decisions and public opinion, even in a state like Texas.
Furthermore, the analysis could benefit from a deeper exploration of the global competitive landscape, including the roles of other major players in the rare earth market beyond China and Australia.
The author downplays just how far the U.S. is behind by not addressing the topic with any candor. Kary’s article offers some insights into the potential impact of the Trump administration’s trade policies on the U.S. rare earth market, highlighting opportunities and challenges. A more nuanced analysis is missing, considering implementation obstacles, environmental factors, and a broader geopolitical context, plus a snapshot at least qualitatively describing the advances of China versus the United States. This would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities involved in any material change in the rare earth element supply chain order.
MetalMiner is owned and operated by Alpha Commodities Inc., a subsidiary of Azul Partners. The media is a spinout of Azul Partners. It positions itself as a leading metal commodities price intelligence brand, providing forecasts, analyses, and solutions for global manufacturers via its SaaS platform, MetalMiner (SM) Insights. Based in Chicago, Azul Partners is a digital B2B media, publishing, and advisory company with 12 procurement, supply chain, and commodities-focused research and advisory ventures, including Spend Matters and MetalMiner. One of the key principals is procurement advisor Lisa Reisman (opens in a new tab).
Daniel
You Might Also Like…