Rare Earth Exchanges

Canada Responds with Tariffs of its Own – What are the Ramifications for Critical Minerals and Rare Earth Elements?

Leave a Comment

Highlights

  • Canada responds to U.S. tariffs with equivalent 25% tariffs on $21 billion of American imports
  • Potential disruption to critical minerals and rare earth elements supply chain between the two countries
  • Trade conflict risks increasing economic instability and potentially benefiting China’s strategic position

Canada has swiftly responded to U.S. President Donald Trump’s imposition of 25-percent tariffs on most Canadian products by announcing retaliatory tariffs of the same rate on $21 billion worth of American imports, set to take effect Tuesday. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau outlined an escalating response, stating that within 21 days, an additional $93 billion (125 billion CAD) in U.S. goods would be subjected to tariffs. The initial targets include American beer, wine, spirits, vegetables, clothing, shoes, perfume, household appliances, furniture, and sports equipment. In addition, non-tariff measures, such as restrictions on critical mineral and energy exports and barring U.S. companies from bidding on government contracts, remain under consideration.

Unfolding Situation

Canadian provincial leaders have reacted strongly, with British Columbia Premier David Eby calling Trump’s tariffs a betrayal of historical ties. Eby has directed liquor stores to halt purchases of American alcohol from Republican-led states and ordered government agencies, including health departments, to stop purchasing U.S. goods.

The Canadian Chamber of Commerce warned that the full impact of the tariffs could reduce Canada’s GDP by 2.6 percent, costing households an estimated $1,900 Annually. Meanwhile, the U.S. economy could shrink by 1.6 percent, costing American households an estimated $1,300 annually.

The broader economic conflict extends beyond Canada, as Trump’s tariff order also targets imports from Mexico and China, further escalating global trade tensions.

What sort of diplomatic negotiations might be underway between the U.S. and Canada?  How will American businesses reliant on Canadian imports respond? What are the long-term geopolitical consequences of an economic standoff between the two traditionally close allies?  

What will the unfolding reactions be within America, particularly from industries affected by the Canadian tariffs?  What are the implications for American consumers and businesses? With trade war rhetoric intensifying, the economic and political fallout could be substantial on both sides of the border, and the entire world for that matter.

On to Critical Minerals

The escalating U.S.-Canada tariff war threatens to disrupt the rare earth elements (REE) and critical minerals sector, potentially increasing supply chain instability, rising costs, and dependence on China.

Canada, a major producer of nickel, cobalt, lithium, graphite, uranium, and REEs, plays a crucial role in North American clean energy, defense, and EV production. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s hinted restrictions on critical mineral exports could significantly impact battery manufacturers, defense contractors, and aerospace industries, forcing the U.S. to seek alternative sources.

A Canadian export ban would deepen the U.S. reliance on China, the world’s dominant supplier of REEs. This would contradict years of efforts to reduce dependence due to geopolitical risks and national security concerns. This trade conflict also threatens investment in North American mining projects, as uncertainty may discourage funding for domestic REE extraction and processing. Both countries have collaborated through initiatives like the Canada-U.S. Joint Action Plan on Critical Minerals, but rising tensions jeopardize progress toward an independent North American REE supply chain.

While exemptions for strategic minerals are possible, failure to reach a resolution could undermine U.S. energy independence and military readiness, ultimately benefiting China. Given the economic and security stakes, the U.S. and Canada may be forced to negotiate exemptions to avoid long-term damage to critical mineral supply chains and maintain North America’s competitive edge in technology, defense, and clean energy sectors.

Spread the word: