Highlights
- Trump administration accelerates mine development through FAST-41 permitting
- Lacks comprehensive midstream and downstream processing strategy
- U.S. remains heavily dependent on foreign processors
- Nearly 50% of mined copper concentrate is exported
- Zero commercial-scale rare earth refining in the U.S.
- Without integrated industrial policy, diplomatic coordination, and strategic manufacturing capabilities, the U.S. risks creating a hollow mineral supply chain
A recent report (opens in a new tab) by Benchmark Minerals outlines a surge of activity under the Trump administration’s second term to accelerate mine development through executive action, including a high-profile list of 20 projects fast-tracked via the FAST-41 permitting framework. However, while the analysis acknowledges the political momentum and Defense Production Act (DPA) funding behind several high-priority projects, it fails to interrogate deeper structural weaknesses in the U.S. critical minerals strategy, particularly in integrated midstream and downstream capacity, industrial coordination, and global competitiveness.
Benchmark Minerals on Trump 2.0 Permitting Drive
Benchmark’s article highlights the Trump administration’s invocation of FAST-41 to compress environmental reviews for copper and other critical mineral projects down to 28 days, calling out Resolution and NewRange as flagship examples. It also credits carryover DPA Title III funds from the Biden era for advancing key graphite and lithium projects like Graphite One and Thacker Pass, and cites rising optimism in the sector, including remarks from Graphite One CEO Anthony Huston.
On the Money—and What’s Missing?
Permitting reform under President Trump has undoubtedly brought velocity to long-stalled mining approvals. However, the exclusive focus on raw material extraction reveals a shallow conception of national resilience.
Nowhere in Benchmark’s report is there a serious discussion of how the U.S. plans to close the gaping hole in midstream and downstream processing—an area still overwhelmingly dominated by China.
The article does cite the serious gap faced by America, but not much else on the topic. As of 2024:
- Nearly 50% of U.S.-mined copper concentrate was exported due to lack of domestic smelting.
- The U.S. possessed zero commercial-scale capacity to refine heavy rare earths.
- Lithium conversion remained almost entirely outsourced to Asia.
- Natural graphite, despite new mining initiatives, was still 100% import dependent—with zero domestic anode manufacturing facilities.
Accelerating mine permitting without synchronized development of refining, metallurgical separation, battery precursor production, and advanced component manufacturing does not build resilience—it exports raw wealth and entrenches U.S. dependency on foreign processors.
The Missing Industrial Policy
The Trump administration has embraced tariffs, subsidies, and executive orders, but without a unifying industrial policy to link upstream extraction with U.S.-based value-added production. FAST-41 is a welcome move for miners. But who will process these minerals? Where is the coordination to scale:
- Rare earth separation facilities with metallurgical capability beyond NdPr?
- Domestic copper smelters that meet modern emissions standards?
- Graphite spheronization and anode plants?
- Cathode and battery-grade nickel refining?
Despite announcing a Section 232 probe into processed mineral imports, the administration has not unveiled a credible roadmap for closing midstream bottlenecks. Nor has it tackled the workforce, permitting harmonization or regional clustering needed to unlock economies of scale across the critical mineral value chain.
Strategic Blind Spots: Diplomatic and Defense Gaps
Benchmark correctly notes that U.S. domestic production, even at full scale, will fall short of meeting projected nickel, cobalt, and graphite demand. However, the Trump administration’s approach to foreign partnerships remains erratic.
There is still no coordinated diplomatic framework for securing offtakes from resource-rich allies in Africa, South America, and Oceania.
Moreover, few of the new mining projects announced under FAST-41 are aligned with Department of Defense (DoD) procurement needs or with a secure, classified logistics infrastructure. A coherent defense-industrial mineral strategy remains elusive.
A Partial Victory in a Much Larger War
Benchmark’s coverage reflects rising enthusiasm in the mining sector as Trump’s executive momentum takes hold. However, the U.S. critical minerals push cannot rest on mine approvals alone. Without:
- A deliberate buildout of midstream refining and component manufacturing;
- A clear-eyed industrial policy integrating public-private partnerships;
- Transparent, science-based toxics and emissions standards; and
- Global diplomatic and defense coordination for resource security,
The U.S. risks building a hollow supply chain—rich in raw ore, but weak in sovereign capacity.
Permitting speed is not a strategy. It’s a tool. And without strategic integration, it may simply fast-track American minerals… to Chinese processors.
For full industry analysis and updates on U.S. rare earth and critical mineral policy, visit www.RareEarthExchanges.com (opens in a new tab), including the Forum for investor discussions (opens in a new tab).
Leave a Reply