Highlights
- China uses conciliatory language to mask a strategic approach of exploiting transatlantic tensions through rare earth export controls.
- Beijing aims to fracture Western unity by positioning itself as a cooperative alternative to US economic policies.
- The rare earth export strategy serves as a diplomatic pressure valve to influence European trade and technology engagement.
Beijing’s conciliatory language masks a sharpened geopolitical strategy built on critical mineral leverage.
A recent China Daily editorial, published June 8, 2025, projects a tone of cooperation and mutual respect as Beijing positions itself as a pragmatic partner to the European Union in the face of renewed U.S. economic nationalism. Yet behind the soft diplomacy lies a strategic calculation: to exploit widening transatlantic fissures—tariff tensions, “America First” trade policies, and diverging regulatory standards—to expand Chinese influence in Europe while using rare earth export controls as leverage.
The editorial, titled “Partnership can once again prove its mettle (opens in a new tab),” frames China as a cooperative counterweight to what it describes as a coercive and hypocritical U.S. foreign policy. It claims the EU is “waking up” to the cost of aligning too closely with Washington and should instead embrace a more “inclusive” and “respectful” partnership with China.
Notably, rare earths play a prominent role in this diplomatic maneuvering. According to the editorial, China’s Commerce Minister Wang Wentao (opens in a new tab) assured EU officials last week that Beijing would expedite approvals for rare earth export licenses and consider establishing a “green channel” for European applicants. This follows months of tightened controls on medium- and heavy-rare earths—controls that disrupted global markets and left European manufacturers scrambling for clarity and supply stability.
Critical Analysis of Underlying Assumptions
From the vantage point of Rare Earth Exchanges (REEx), several claims in the China Daily editorial demand critical scrutiny. While we strive to maintain objectivity in our reporting, we are unapologetically grounded in a U.S. perspective—patriotic, clear-eyed, and committed to exposing strategic risks in global mineral supply chains, with a bias toward free market systems and democracies.
So, Beijing wants the world to believe its rare earth export controls are routine, merely following international norms. But the reality tells a different story. While dual-use export regimes are indeed standard, China’s system is anything but transparent. License approvals are vague, politically timed, and selectively enforced—tools of strategic manipulation, not market stability.
The China Daily editorial also portrays China as the passive partner, with the EU supposedly taking the initiative to repair ties. That narrative is convenient but misleading. In truth, Beijing’s recent diplomatic overtures are finely tuned to exploit growing rifts between Washington and Brussels.
This isn’t passive engagement—it’s a tactical push to fracture Western unity on tech trade and derail the global de-risking agenda.
And as for the lofty claims about shared commitment to free trade? Let’s not forget China’s track record: abrupt export restrictions, relentless IP coercion, and massive state-backed industrial overcapacity. The rhetoric of partnership masks a deeper agenda—one that bends multilateralism to serve Beijing’s strategic ambitions.
The mention of upcoming price commitment consultations on electric vehicles and “new technical paths” further reveals Beijing’s dual strategy: to soften regulatory backlash while continuing to tilt the competitive advantage toward the Chinese industry. The rare earth channel offer, while seemingly conciliatory, is in fact a pressure valve—one that China can open or close depending on the geopolitical climate.
Takeaways
While China Daily urges the EU to adopt “inclusive cooperation,” the editorial’s subtext is clear: China will utilize its dominant position in rare earths to influence European behavior on trade, technology, and security. European officials and their allied nations should view these overtures with a clear eye. The actual test of partnership is not rhetorical harmony, but supply chain resilience, reciprocity, and rules-based engagement.
Prepared by Rare Earth Exchanges (REEx), the independent intelligence platform for retail investors tracking strategic mineral markets, trade policy, and geopolitical risk. Visit the Forum (opens in a new tab) to discuss.
Leave a Reply