Highlights

• Baogang Group's Party meeting focuses on enforcing ideological conformity and combating internal corruption in its rare earth operations.
• The company's internal discipline campaign signals Beijing's readiness to politically weaponize critical mineral resource flows.
• Western buyers and investors must view Chinese rare earth companies as state-directed instruments with embedded political missions, not traditional commercial entities.

---

On June 9, Baogang Group—the state-owned steel and rare earth conglomerate headquartered in Inner Mongolia—convened its sixth Party theoretical study session of 2025. The meeting, held in Room 812 of the company’s Information Tower, focused squarely on enforcing ideological conformity, combating internal corruption, and eliminating what the Communist Party describes as “unhealthy tendencies” within corporate ranks.

At the center of the discussion was a campaign to “rectify irregular eating and drinking,” a euphemism for bribery, excessive hospitality, and the misuse of company funds—issues that the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) has linked to the erosion of Party discipline and loyalty. Company Party Secretary and Chairman Meng Fanying presided over the session, which featured speeches from senior leadership and written submissions from others.

The central directive under review was the CCP’s recent Notice on Intensifying the Crackdown on Irregular Eating and Drinking, which was echoed by the Inner Mongolia Party Committee and reinforced at national anti-corruption mobilization meetings. These efforts are framed as vital to maintaining “political hygiene” in key sectors, such as Baogang’s rare earth business, which plays a dominant role in the global supply of heavy rare earths, especially dysprosium and terbium.

Implications for Western Rare Earth Strategy

Baogang’s renewed internal discipline campaign is more than an HR issue—it is a political signal. As a linchpin of China's state-controlled rare earth refining apparatus, the company’s operations are now under intensified scrutiny by the Party at a time when global buyers, especially in the U.S., are urgently seeking alternative supply chains.

Party Secretary Meng emphasized the role of “key few” leaders in leading by example, enforcing top-down responsibility, and implementing dual-role accountability structures (“one post, two duties”) for all managers. These structures align corporate operations directly with political loyalty, embedding surveillance, self-criticism, and ideological audits into daily management, thereby further politicizing a supply chain that is already vulnerable to geopolitical shocks.

Such measures introduce operational rigidity and reduce transparency for foreign partners. Western firms seeking to do business with Chinese rare earth processors must now reckon with the reality that these companies are instruments of political enforcement, not just commercial entities. While corruption crackdowns may appear to promote integrity, they also serve as tools for consolidating centralized control, often at the cost of flexibility and openness.

Strategic Insight

Baogang’s latest meeting reinforces a trend observed across Chinese critical mineral enterprises: a deeper political embedding and a zero-tolerance stance toward dissent or deviation from Xi Jinping Thought. As U.S. policymakers push forward with rare earth industrial policy and tariff expansion, this internal tightening at Baogang signals Beijing’s readiness to weaponize resource flows politically.

Western buyers, investors, and policymakers should treat Chinese rare earth companies not as private-sector peers, but as state-directed instruments with embedded ideological missions. The political risk is not only external—it now permeates the corporate culture of China’s resource monopolies.

Source: Baogang Daily, June 13, 2025. Translated and critically analyzed by Rare Earth Exchanges.