Highlights
- The UK hosts rare earth mineral deposits but remains functionally dependent on Chinese midstream processing—a vulnerability confirmed by both the British Geological Survey and a government-commissioned Frazer-Nash study.
- In January 2026, the UK government offered £12 million to support Ionic Technologies' Belfast facility, designed to produce 400 tonnes annually of separated magnet rare earth oxides using recycling technology.
- This marks Britain's shift from geological surveys to industrial midstream capability—demonstrating that control over separation, metals, and magnet production, not mineral deposits, determines supply-chain sovereignty.
This updated Rare Earth Exchanges™ analysis revisits the United Kingdom’s rare earth dilemma by integrating two authoritative assessments—the British Geological Survey’s geology-first review and a UK government–commissioned paper on recycling and midstream processing—alongside newly announced government-backed magnet-recycling capacity. We separate enduring structural constraints from genuine progress and explain why midstream capability, not mineral occurrence, defines supply-chain sovereignty. Thanks to community members for sending updated information as well.
Britain Has Rocks—Now It’s Building Circuits: The Rare Earth Bottleneck Revisited
British Geological Survey (BGS) study delivered an uncomfortable truth: while the UK hosts rare earth occurrences, it lacks commercial-scale separation and refining, leaving it functionally dependent on foreign—predominantly Chinese—midstream supply. That diagnosis remains correct. What has changed in 2025–2026 is the policy response—and, finally, industrial assets moving beyond the laboratory.
Authored by David Currie and Holly Elliott, The Potential for Rare Earth Elements in the UK dismantles a persistent illusion: geology alone does not equal security. Leverage accrues to those who control separation circuits, metals and alloys, and magnet production—not to those who merely extract rock.
That conclusion is now reinforced by a second, policy-driven analysis.
Two Studies, One Verdict: The Midstream Decides
A UK government–commissioned paper, UK Critical Minerals Recycling and Midstream Processing (opens in a new tab), authored by Frazer-Nash Consultancy (for the Department for Business and Trade), reaches the same destination from a different route. Rather than geology, it interrogates processing, recycling, skills, scale-up timelines, and market readiness—and finds the UK’s principal exposure sits squarely in the midstream.
Together, the BGS and Frazer-Nash papers converge on a single conclusion: without domestic separation, metal-making, and magnet-grade pathways, mineral endowment offers little strategic insulation.
What the Geology Gives—and Withholds
The BGS mapped REE-bearing formations in Wales, northwest Scotland, and parts of England. Localized samples can approach ~2% total rare earth oxides, but deposits are small, discontinuous, and uneconomic under current conditions. The UK has never produced rare earths at a commercial scale. On this point, the evidence is settled.
Downstream vulnerability persists. Even as China’s mining share trends toward ~65%, its dominance in separation, metals, and permanent magnets continues to anchor global leverage.
From Reports to Reality: Processing and Magnets Arrive
Here is the material update. In January 2026, the UK government issued an Offer in Principle for a £12 million capital (opens in a new tab) grant to support a commercial rare earth permanent-magnet recycling facility in Belfast, led by Ionic Technologies, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ionic Rare Earths. The proposed plant is designed to produce ~400 tonnes per annum of ≥99.5%-purity separated magnet rare earth oxides (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb) using patented long-loop recycling technology, with targeted first production within ~two years, subject to final investment decision and due diligence
Ionic.
This isnot mining—and that is precisely the point. It is midstreamcapability, directly aligned with the UK’s Critical Minerals Strategy target of 10% domestic supply and 20% via recycling by 2035. Demonstration-scale operations have already produced separated dysprosium and terbium oxides, validating magnet-grade pathways beyond proof-of-concept.
Progress, With Proportions
Scale still matters. Recycling is additive, not substitutive. Volumes remain modest relative to national demand, and the UK still lacks primary separation from mixed concentrates. Yet Belfast breaks a long-standing binary: it demonstrates that Britain can host industrial REO separation for magnets, not just studies and strategy papers.
REEx Verdict
The diagnosis from both the BGS and Frazer-Nash stands: rocks alone do not confer power. But Britain is finally addressing the correct bottleneck. If Belfast reaches FID and ramps as planned, the UK moves from pure dependency to partial agency—not independence, but momentum. In rare earths, momentum is how leverage is rebuilt.
Sources: Currie & Elliott (2024), The Potential for Rare Earth Elements in the UK, British Geological Survey; Frazer-Nash Consultancy, UK Critical Minerals Recycling and Midstream Processing (UK Government-commissioned); Ionic Rare Earths ASX Announcement (27 Jan 2026).
4 Comments
4 replies
Loading new replies...
New member
New member
New member
New member
Join the full discussion at the Rare Earth Exchanges Forum →