Highlights

• Brazil ranks second globally in rare earth reserves but produces minimal output due to limited separation capacity and downstream manufacturing infrastructure.
• President Lula is expected to sign a non-binding MOU with India on critical minerals, reflecting Brazil's multi-alignment approach with U.S., Europe, India, and China.
• Brazil's graphite production declined 8% annually since 2017 while global output grew 10%, highlighting the gap between geological potential and industrial execution.

---

Brazil is widely cited as holding the world’s second-largest rare earth reserves, yet its actual production remains small. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is expected to sign a nonbinding memorandum of understanding (MOU) with India on critical minerals. Officials acknowledge it is a framework for dialogue, not a binding supply deal. Meanwhile, internal debates over how open Brazil should be to foreign partners have delayed a unified national strategy. In simple terms, Brazil has geological scale, but industrial follow-through remains limited.

The Reserve Claim: Accurate, With Context

According to global mineral reserve estimates, Brazil does rank among the top two countries for rare earth reserves, behind China. The country also holds substantial reserves of graphite, niobium, and growing lithium assets.

And this part of the Rio Times reporting (opens in a new tab) is broadly accurate.

However, reserves are defined as economically extractable material under current conditions. They are not equivalent to annual output or processing capacity.

Production Reality: Serra Verde and the Scale Question

Brazil’s principal producing rare earth operation is Serra Verde, an ionic clay project. It represents meaningful progress but does not materially shift global supply balances. Brazil does not currently possess a large-scale rare earth separation capacity comparable to China’s dominant infrastructure. Nor does it operate major downstream magnet manufacturing hubs.

Thus, while reserve size is significant, Brazil’s share of global rare earth production remains limited.

The Graphite Data: A Credible Signal

The Rio Times cites a government study indicating Brazil’s graphite production declined approximately 8% annually since 2017 while global production grew near 10% annually. While precise figures should be independently verified, the broader trend—that Brazil’s production growth has lagged global expansion—is directionally credible.

Lithium is the notable exception, where Brazil has experienced expansion and increased investor interest.

The structural issue is consistent: resource abundance without industrial scaling.

Strategy or Strategic Hedging?

Brazilian media introduces Brazil’s cautious engagement with U.S.-led initiatives such as FORGE as a strategic distance. That interpretation reflects political framing rather than hard data, however.   South America’s most populous nation is pursuing multi-alignment—engaging simultaneously with India, the United States, Europe, and China. This preserves geopolitical flexibility. Whether it delays decisive capital deployment is a matter of interpretation, not a settled fact.

What Matters for the Rare Earth Supply Chain

The core bottleneck in rare earth supply chains remains separation and magnet manufacturing—not raw extraction alone.

If Brazil increases mining but exports concentrates for processing abroad, it risks repeating the historical pattern of commodity export without value capture.  On that note, some companies are making interesting moves, such as Brazilian Rare Earths and its deal with French refiner Carester. The leadership at the Australian traded rare earth miner understands the need for processing capability on shore.

However, the general trend picked up by the Brazilian media centers on the ultimate reality that for Western diversification, Brazil represents geological optionality. For investors, it represents an opportunity tempered by policy execution risk.

Reserves are geological. Industrial strategy is policy. Supply chain power requires both.

Source: The Rio Times, February 13, 2026.