Highlights

• Mining has transitioned from price-driven to policy-led markets, with 47% of respondents prioritizing political variables like policy support and geopolitical risk mitigation as their top concern for 2026.
• Rare earths are experiencing a policy-driven bull market fueled by export controls, government equity stakes, and national security concerns—though oversupply risks loom if end-market demand doesn't materialize.
• Strategic M&A partnerships between governments, institutions, and private firms are expected to dominate 2026, as political durability becomes more valuable than geological attractiveness alone.

---

In its January 2026 flagship report, Mining & Metals 2026: Adapting to a Policy-Driven Business Cycle, White & Case delivers a stark assessment: mining has crossed a structural line. The sector is no longer governed primarily by prices, marginal costs, or incremental supply–demand shifts. It is now policy-led.

Geopolitics—manifested through export controls, subsidies, equity stakes, preferential lending, and strategic stockpiles—has become the decisive force shaping capital access, deal timing, and perceived asset value.

Nearly 47% of survey respondents identify political variables—securing policy support, mitigating geopolitical risk, or accessing critical minerals—as their top priority for 2026. Close to 40% expect state-backed capital to become the default intervention tool across developed markets.

Mining, in short, is no longer merely regulated by governments. It is increasingly capitalized by them.

From Prices to Power

White & Case traces how 2025 pushed the industry into a politics-first deal cycle. Rapid and often asymmetric policy shifts in the U.S. and China distorted trade flows, incentivized precautionary stockpiling, and vaulted critical minerals to the front of the investment queue—frequently independent of near-term fundamentals.

The divergence is expected to deepen. 73% of respondents anticipate further U.S.–China policy separation on trade and critical minerals over the next year. This matters because many metals markets remain well supplied or oversupplied. In such conditions, policy support—not scarcity—has become the primary lever sustaining investment theses.

Rare earths fit this profile almost perfectly.

Rare Earths: A Political Bull Market

White & Case is explicit: rare earths are in a policy-driven bull market. Export controls, stockpile anxiety, and national-security framing have created pricing premiums and financing pathways untethered from traditional demand curves. The U.S. government’s readiness to take equity positions and guarantee long-dated offtake—most visibly in permanent-magnet supply chains—has reset investor expectations.

The analysis is directionally correct. Policy has an outsized influence on rare earths because volumes are small, processing is highly concentrated, and substitution options are limited. But the report also delivers a cautionary note: policy can overbuild supply. One respondent likened the current surge to a “gold rush” that could run two to three years before reversing if end-market demand fails to validate political enthusiasm. _Rare Earth Exchanges_™ has cautioned policymakers in the U.S. government to consider a deeper, broader industrial policy to mitigate against such risks.

M&A and the Search for “Sure Bets”

Volatile national policies and resource nationalism are often framed as deal killers. White & Case argues the opposite: they are increasingly deal catalysts. Strategic partnerships—especially government–institution–private alliances—are expected to dominate 2026 M&A.

High-profile moves, including the attempted combination of Anglo American and Teck Resources, reflect a broader scramble for assets viewed as politically durable rather than merely geologically attractive.

The REEx Take

White & Case gets the macro diagnosis right. Mining is now overtly political. Where caution is warranted is in assuming those tailwinds are permanent. Policy can accelerate projects; it cannot manufacture demand. In rare earths, the winners will still be determined by processing capacity, qualification, and integration into real manufacturing ecosystems.

Source: White & Case LLP, “Mining & Metals 2026: Adapting to a Policy-Driven Business Cycl (opens in a new tab)e.”