Highlights

• China has not publicly released 2025 rare earth mining and refining quotas, breaking from previous transparency practices.
• The delay may be due to multiple factors including domestic consolidation, price stabilization, and environmental checks.
• Investors should track multiple data sources to understand the potential impact on global rare earth supply chains.

---

The South China Morning Post (SCMP) reports China has not yet published its 2025 rare earth mining and refining quotas—a notable shift from established practice. This is accurate. In 2023 and 2024, Beijing released quotas in multiple batches, publicly disclosed and widely tracked by industry analysts. The SCMP is also correct that China quietly issued a first batch of 2025 quotas to two producers, though without public numbers. Historically, such figures are vital for market planning, shaping everything from contract negotiations to spot pricing.

Where Certainty Ends, Speculation Begins

The claim that China may “no longer disclose specific quota amounts” is attributed to Cailian Press (opens in a new tab) but framed as an emerging policy. That remains conjecture. Beijing has not formally announced any change to disclosure rules. Past delays have occurred—sometimes due to internal audits, environmental checks, or political timing. Suggesting a permanent blackout risks overstating what may be temporary opacity.

The Geopolitical Frame: Tilted Angles

The article leans heavily on the U.S.–China trade war narrative, implying that withholding quotas is a pressure tactic against Washington. While plausible, this framing omits other drivers: China’s domestic consolidation of the “Big Six” rare earth groups, internal price stabilization goals, and environmental enforcement. To pin the delay solely on U.S. tensions narrows a far broader set of motives. That’s narrative bias—not outright misinformation, but a selective spotlight.

What Investors Aren’t Told

Missing from the SCMP’s piece is the knock-on effect for ex-China supply chains. With Lynas, MP Materials, and emerging African and Brazilian projects seeking to capture market share, Beijing’s silence has ripple effects beyond Washington. By not connecting quota opacity to the ex-China diversification trend, the article shortchanges investors who need the full chessboard view.

Bottom Line

Yes, China’s decision not to publish quotas on schedule is real—and troubling for transparency. But readers should treat talk of a permanent information blackout or purely U.S.-focused motives with caution. Until Beijing makes a formal policy move, this is more smoke than fire. Investors should track both Chinese official channels and alternative data—export flows, customs numbers, and price signals—for the real picture.

©!-- /wp:paragraph -->