Highlights

• Chinese academic Zhu Feng condemns Trump administration's trade and security policies as undermining global multilateralism.
• Editorial argues US is weaponizing economic tools like tariffs and mineral controls to maintain hegemonic dominance.
• China Daily piece warns of potential global destabilization through US 'metal politics' and strategic mineral control.

---

In a June 23 editorial titled “Aggressive Regression,” (opens in a new tab) Zhu Feng, dean at Nanjing University’s School of International Studies, delivers a sweeping condemnation of the Trump administration’s trade, energy, and security policies—framing the United States as a destabilizing “revisionist state” undermining the international order. The piece appears in China Daily Global, a state-run outlet widely known for aligning with Beijing’s geopolitical narratives.

Zhu argues that under President Trump, the U.S. has abandoned liberal internationalism, torpedoed multilateralism, and weaponized economic tools such as tariffs and critical mineral control in a bid to maintain hegemonic dominance. The article claims:

• The U.S. is withdrawing from global responsibilities (e.g., Paris Climate Agreement, WHO).
• It is ignoring trade norms by launching large-scale tariff wars against allies and rivals alike.
• Trump has openly challenged national sovereignty norms—allegedly proposing to annex Greenland, claim 50% of Ukraine’s mineral resources, and even make Canada the “51st state.”

The editorial concludes that the Trump administration is ushering in an era of “metal politics,” where control over rare earths and critical minerals replaces oil as the foundation of geopolitical power. It warns that U.S. actions may exacerbate global inflation, bolster far-right movements in Europe, and erode the liberal order.

REEx Reflections

The article is framed through an unmistakably ideological lens, combining selective facts, exaggerated hypotheticals, and rhetorical escalation. Assertions that Trump aims to rename the Gulf of Mexico or annex Canada reflect speculative caricature rather than substantiated policy. The author's affiliations and the platform—China Daily’s _China Watch_—suggest alignment with Chinese state messaging, which, of course, raises its own implications.

Absent from the piece is any acknowledgment of China’s own dominance in global critical mineral supply chains, including its use of rare earth export controls as strategic leverage. Nor does it mention recent escalations such as export restrictions on gallium, germanium, and heavy REEs—moves widely interpreted as geopolitical tools.

---

Rare Earth Exchanges Bias Meter™ for Zhu Feng's Article

Dimension	Assessment
Source Bias	State-sponsored (China Daily)
Fact-to-Rhetoric Ratio	Moderate-to-low
Independent Voices	Absent
Propaganda Red Flags	High (exaggeration, omission)
Overall Bias Rating: State-Aligned Geopolitical Rhetoric™