Highlights

• AFP report reveals China's engineered monopoly over heavy rare earths in Ganzhou, controlling reserves, separation technology, and export licensing across the entire supply chain.
• Western alternative supply chains in Australia, U.S., Japan, and Malaysia remain years behind Chinese scale despite $8.5B commitments and narratives of imminent magnet abundance.
• China's export controls have evolved from reactive trade war tactics into a codified regulatory regime that rewrites global rules for magnet metals and heavy rare earth flows.

---

A new Agence France-Presse (AFP) report, picked up by France 24 (opens in a new tab), offers a rare on-the-ground look at China’s heavy rare earth operations in Ganzhou—a region long known inside the industry as the world’s single most important cluster for elements like yttrium, terbium, and dysprosium.

The article correctly captures the extraordinary scale and state-managed discipline of China’s rare earth sector, showing trucks streaming through ion-adsorption clay mines and the rise of sprawling new headquarters for China Rare Earth Group. This matches what REEx analysts have documented for years: China’s dominance is not accidental—it is engineered.

What the Story Nails: The Architecture of Monopoly

China’s strength spans all layers of the supply chain:

• the world’s largest heavy rare earth reserves,
• separation expertise unrivaled outside Jiangxi and Inner Mongolia,
• and tight controls on export licensing, technology transfer, and even personnel mobility.

AFP is correct that the West’s alternative supply chains—Australia, the U.S., Japan, Malaysia—are still years away from matching Chinese scale. Washington’s $8.5B commitments and new alliances are meaningful but embryonic as Rare Earth Exchanges has chronicled. This, despite narratives out of Washington DC that “we’ll have more rare earth magnets than we know what to do with by next year.” The report also notes U.S. history accurately: America once led rare earth extraction at Mountain Pass, only to offshore it in the 1980s–1990s due to cost and environmental pressures.

Where the Article Drifts Into Comfortable Narratives

A “Trade War Lever” or a Long-Game Strategy?

AFP frames China’s export controls as a reactive tool in Trump-era tariff politics. The reality is more structural: China’s rare earth restrictions have evolved from sporadic pressure (2010 Japan incident) into a codified regulatory regime. The report understates this. Beijing isn’t merely negotiating; it is rewriting the global ruleset governing magnet metals, heavy rare earth flows, and separation technology.

The “Victory for Beijing” Framing

AFP leans toward a geopolitical “win” narrative after Trump and Xi secured a one-year reprieve. REEx interpretation differs: the truce mostly preserves Chinese discretion, not U.S. (or European) supply security. A temporary licensing pause does not unwind China’s structural chokehold.

The Real Signal for Investors

The key takeaway is not the theatrics of diplomacy. It is this:

China’s rare earth dominance has matured into a strategic instrument built on scale, technology, and talent—not just geology. The U.S. and allies may accelerate diversification, but the heavy rare earth bottleneck—yttrium, terbium, dysprosium—remains a multi-year challenge with no quick fixes. A comprehensive industrial policy represents the only fix, other than strategic acquiescence.

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.