Highlights

• China controls 85-90% of global rare earth processing and 99% of heavy rare earth refining.
• This control transforms decarbonization dependencies into geopolitical leverage through export controls and strategic industrial integration.
• Western timelines are critically mismatched: while China invested $57B since 2000 and operates integrated mine-to-magnet supply chains, U.S. and European projects won't reach scale until 2035, when China's dominance may exceed 90%.
• Corporate exposure extends beyond procurement into R&D, ESG commitments, and valuation models.
• China's export licensing creates supply risk driven by political alignment rather than market signals, requiring multi-horizon mitigation strategies.

---

Every wind turbine, electric vehicle, and fighter jet now runs through China’s hands. Not by coincidence—by design. While the West framed decarbonization as moral progress, Beijing treated it as industrial capture. The world’s energy transition has been built on materials China controls, processes, and increasingly weaponizes. China’s 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030) (opens in a new tab) transforms rare earths from an industrial asset into a strategic instrument. The plan anchors what Xi Jinping calls strategic endurance: a posture built for prolonged economic and technological confrontation with the West. Rare earths:17 metals that make electric motors spin, turbines turn, and precision weapons function sit at the center of this architecture.

Beijing controls 85–90 percent of global processing capacity, 99 percent of heavy rare earth refining, and roughly the same share of permanent magnet production. That dominance is no longer just an economic advantage; it is leverage. Through the October 2025 export controls, covering 12 of the 17 rare earth elements, finished magnets, and even technologies used to process them. China effectively drew a red line through the supply chains of the green economy.

For corporate strategists, this isn’t an abstract geopolitical narrative. It’s a structural exposure embedded in cost models, R&D roadmaps, and ESG commitments. Decarbonization and defense modernization both depend on inputs that can be throttled by political decisions. The strategic question is no longer if this leverage will be used, but how soon and how selectively.

The 15th Plan operates across three time horizons: consolidation to 2030, modernization to 2035, and dominance through 2060’s carbon neutrality goal. Each layer aligns industrial capacity, technological innovation, and export policy around one idea—control the chokepoints, and you shape the transition itself.

Key Takeaways

1. China built leverage by mastering the middle, not the mine.

Western debates still focus on mining rights, but the economic gravity lies in processing. Nearly 80 percent of total rare earth supply-chain costs sit in the refining and separation stages—precisely where China holds near-monopoly control. That control isn’t accidental; it reflects five decades of accumulated expertise, scale efficiencies, and environmental tolerance others avoided. Even when mining happens abroad, the concentrates usually end up in Chinese facilities for purification. Until that midstream dependency is broken, “diversification” remains a narrative, not a hedge.

2. Export controls now function as statecraft.

The October 2025 measures created an administrative weapon: a licensing system that differentiates approvals based on end-use and diplomatic alignment. Defense and semiconductor applications receive maximum scrutiny; aligned countries gain preferential treatment. For companies, that means supply risk will no longer follow price signals alone. It will follow political temperature. Compliance, sourcing, and even R&D partnerships will be screened through geopolitical filters. This is supply chain governance as foreign policy.

3. Western timelines are strategically mismatched.

Building independent processing capacity takes a decade or more. The U.S. and Europe have committed roughly $2 billion combined; China invested nearly $57 billion in critical minerals between 2000 and 2021 and continues expanding. Even with accelerated permitting, most Western projects will reach scale around 2035. By then, China’s processing share could exceed 90 percent, compounded by advances in recycling, patents, and overseas equity control through the Belt and Road Initiative. The West is sprinting a marathon China started in 1970.

4. China’s rare earth strategy scales with its domestic demand.

Between 2026 and 2030, China will increase annual electric-vehicle output to 15–20 million units, expand offshore wind capacity by thousands of turbines, and deepen defense modernization. That domestic demand will absorb a growing share of production, reducing exports from roughly 50 percent historically to perhaps 25 percent by 2030. For foreign buyers, scarcity will no longer reflect geological limits. It will reflect policy design. The effect: rising price volatility, longer lead times, and preference hierarchies where Chinese industries buy first.

5. Vertical integration converts dominance into permanence.

From mine to magnet to finished goods, Chinese firms operate as a single industrial organism. Low-cost feedstock flows into subsidized magnet manufacturers, who supply state-favored electric-vehicle and wind-power producers, closing the loop inside China’s borders. The result is economic gravity: each layer of integration lowers cost and raises switching friction for everyone else. Western producers face higher unit costs, fragmented ownership, and capital markets that demand short-term returns. Competing against a state-directed ecosystem built for endurance is less a market contest than a structural asymmetry.

Strategic Implications

For companies, the rare earth trap isn’t limited to defense or heavy industry. It extends into every decarbonization portfolio. Permanent magnets are embedded in electric drivetrains, robotics, factory automation, and even medical imaging. As China’s export controls extend to products containing trace Chinese content, exposure becomes diffuse. An American or European manufacturer could face licensing uncertainty not because of where it assembles a product, but because of the origin of a component three tiers down.

The 15th Plan’s emphasis on “new quality productive forces”. A term denoting innovation-driven productivity means rare earths are not a transitional dependency but a permanent strategic foundation. They enable the technologies China uses to define the next productivity frontier: artificial intelligence hardware, precision manufacturing, quantum systems, advanced aerospace, and clean energy. That linkage between materials and innovation capacity is the heart of the strategy. Whoever owns the materials sets the pace of technological progress.

China’s move from growth maximization to resilience marks another shift Western firms often overlook. Targeting 4–5 percent GDP growth, Beijing accepts slower output in exchange for control and survivability. This balance sheet of endurance is backed by state financing, long-term R&D, and consolidation into three national champions. This creates a rare earth industry that can operate below commercial break-even for years. Western supply projects, subject to shareholder returns and environmental litigation, cannot match that resilience without political cover and subsidy structures that don’t yet exist.

Environmental asymmetry compounds the problem. Rare earth refining produces radioactive and chemical waste that Western jurisdictions struggle to permit. China, after decades of lax regulation, now has both the infrastructure and regulatory flexibility to handle large-scale refining, while others debate environmental trade-offs. The result: moral high ground, material dependence.

Financial asymmetry follows. Chinese state-owned enterprises operate with balance sheets designed for strategic continuity, not quarterly earnings. When prices rise, they expand; when prices fall, they consolidate. Either way, global market share grows. For private Western firms, that volatility kills investment appetite. Strategic pricing (selling below cost to erode new entrants) has historically been China’s most effective deterrent against external competition.

By 2030, China could produce 350,000–400,000 metric tons of rare earth oxides annually while maintaining roughly 70 percent of global output. Processing dominance may rise to 95 percent. Even if Beijing becomes a net importer by 2035, it will still control the highest-value stages of the chain: processing, magnet manufacturing, and downstream integration, locking in rent capture and policy influence.

Corporate Exposure and Response Options

For board-level strategists, this is not a problem to delegate to procurement. It touches core risk, valuation, and growth models. Five exposure vectors stand out:

1. Input concentration risk: Over 85 percent of global magnet supply originates in China; dual sourcing is often an illusion when both suppliers depend on Chinese intermediates.
2. Technology dependence: China’s 25,000 rare earth-related patents embed its intellectual property into global manufacturing standards, creating hidden licensing exposure.
3. Cost volatility: Export licensing and strategic stockpiling generate price spikes detached from fundamentals; planning assumptions must model political triggers, not just market cycles.
4. Compliance risk: Expanded Chinese jurisdiction over downstream products means companies could face dual-regime obligations—Chinese export licensing on one side, Western sanctions on the other.
5. Strategic lag: Current Western capacity projects target 2032–2035 readiness. Corporate decarbonization pledges front-load demand years before secure supply appears.

Mitigation requires simultaneous adaptation across three horizons. Short term (1–3 years): transparency: trace material origins to at least the processing stage and stress-test supply interruptions under licensing delays. Medium term (3–7 years): consortium investment joins regional processing or recycling initiatives to spread risk and gain policy leverage. Long term (7–15 years): design substitution fund R&D in magnet-free motor architectures, heavy-rare-earth-reduced compositions, and closed-loop recovery systems.

No single company can solve structural asymmetry, but collective exposure creates alignment for pre-competitive cooperation. Similar frameworks (semiconductors, aviation safety) show how industry coordination can precede government coherence. Without that, policy incentives will trail the crisis.

The Next Phase: Strategic Endurance Meets Market Fatigue

By 2030, China’s domestic consumption will outstrip its exports. At that point, scarcity becomes a structural feature of the green economy, not a temporary shock. Western governments may respond with subsidies and stockpiles, but those remain tactical. What matters strategically is the integration gap: China runs a whole-of-supply-chain model; the West runs fragments connected by contracts.

As the world races to electrify transport and power generation, material intensity grows faster than substitution technologies. Each incremental gigawatt of wind power or million electric vehicles deepens exposure. Without synchronized industrial policy, Western nations risk financing their own dependencies under the banner of sustainability.

Rare earths expose a broader truth: the green transition isn’t a neutral marketplace; it’s an arena of power projection. Industrial policy has become the language of strategy. China’s 15th Plan formalizes it; the rest of the world still treats it as an afterthought.

Closing Line

The rare earth question isn’t about geology; it’s about commitment and dedication, expertise, capital, and importantly, time. China started early, invested deeply, and built endurance into every link of the chain. The West can still compete, but only if it stops mistaking awareness for action.