Highlights

• Jack Lifton critiques widespread scientific illiteracy among journalists and policymakers in understanding critical minerals and mining processes.
• The U.S. has lost mining expertise due to bureaucratic consolidation, leaving Western nations vulnerable to China's industrial dominance.
• Challenges persist in understanding economic mineral processing, with complexities ranging from mineral discoveries to viable mining operations.

In his sharply worded critique, Jack Lifton, Co-Chair of the Critical Minerals Institute in InvestorNews (opens in a new tab), argues that widespread scientific illiteracy among journalists, policymakers, and even STEM-trained “experts” is undermining serious discourse on critical minerals. He asserts that most reporting is misleading or worthless because few understand basic concepts in chemistry, geology, and physics—starting with what a mineral actually is. Lifton emphasizes that only minerals that can be economically processed into usable chemical elements are valuable, and he explains the distinction between discoveries, deposits, and mines to highlight the complexity of mining viability.

Rare Earth Exchanges was launched late last year in part due to this exact deficiency, so concur generally with Lifton and thereby support InvestorNews.

Lifton further traces the degradation of U.S. mining competence to the late 20th century when bureaucratic consolidation and neglect led to the loss of hands-on expertise in the Department of Interior’s mining agencies. This disconnect between practical resource development and policymaking, he warns, leaves Western nations vulnerable, especially as China continues to dominate industrial and resource extraction sectors. Lifton, in “The Inevitable Train Wreck from Scientific Illiteracy in the Critical Minerals Industry,” questions whether nations run by detached bureaucrats and untrained “experts” can realistically compete with China’s more grounded industrial strategies.

On the other hand, a lot now unfolds in interesting and, in many respects, positive ways. President Trump’s executive order certainly is a start, although it doesn’t address all the underlying forces necessary to both embrace and take on.  Rare Earth Investor, in a recent comment on Rare Earth Exchanges, on the one hand, points out that too much emphasis persists on upstream access and feedstock, but that America makes more progress midstream and downstream as well.  See the link.

But given the mass state subsidies that the state-owned Chinese rare earth companies benefit from, plus monopoly positions over midstream and downstream positions, Rare Earth Investor may be overly optimistic.  But progress is certainly being made. What are your thoughts?