Energy Dominance vs. Mineral Reality: When Rhetoric Meets the Rare Earth Wall

Dec 12, 2025

Highlights

  • Phil Verleger argues that U.S. energy dominance is illusory compared to China's rare earth controlโ€”dominance requires low costs and choke point control, not just export volume.
  • China's integration across mining, separation (85% global capacity), and magnet manufacturing creates genuine market power that energy exporters cannot replicate.
  • The next decade's strategic advantage lies in controlling hard-to-replace materials like rare earth magnets, not energy volumesโ€”policy now shapes these markets as much as price.

Power feels permanent until the supply chain is tested. Phil Verlegerโ€™s argument that the United States cannot achieve true energy dominance lands hard for audiences raised on export tallies and LNG triumphalism. His claim is simple and largely correct: dominance belongs to low-cost producers that control choke pointsโ€”not to high-cost suppliers leaning on diplomacy, finance, or coercion.

In rare earths, Verleger points to China as the uncomfortable counterexample: a nation that truly commands pricing power, allocation, and downstream manufacturing.

That comparison matters. Energy markets are fluid. Rare earth markets are not.

Where the Analysis Holds Firm

Verleger is right in his opinion piece (opens in a new tab) on the structural facts investors too often gloss over. China remains the worldโ€™s lowest-cost producer across rare earth mining, controls roughly 85% of global separation capacity, and manufactures the overwhelming majority of permanent magnetsโ€”the true value engine of the sector. That integration, not mine output alone, defines dominance.

By contrast, the U.S. produces energy at relatively high marginal cost and lacks the ability to block substitutes. Oil, gas, and LNG can be rerouted through global spot markets. Rare earth magnets cannot. His observation that China preserved control by suppressing pricesโ€”discouraging alternative supplyโ€”is historically sound. Western producers did not fail for lack of geology; they failed because economics never cleared.

Where the Frame Tightens Too Much

The argument leans heavily on cost curves while understating how policy now shapes markets. Rare earths today are no longer governed solely by price signals. Export controls, defense procurement, stockpiling, and state-backed offtake agreements are actively rewriting market logic. Chinaโ€™s dominance remains realโ€”but it is no longer frictionless. Verlegerโ€™s framing risks freezing the picture at its most convenient angle.

There is also a subtle asymmetry: energy โ€œcoercionโ€ is treated as artificial, while Chinaโ€™s industrial policy is framed as organic. In reality, both systems are state-shaped. Investors should recognize the difference without romanticizing either.

Why This Matters for the Rare Earth Supply Chain

The most telling insight is not about energy at all. It is the implicit admission that rare earths represent the modern gold standard of strategic dominance. Energy exports buy influence. Rare earth magnets confer leverage. That distinction explains why governments now subsidize processing plantsโ€”not wells.

For Rare Earth Exchangesโ„ข readers, the message is clear: the next decade will not be decided by who produces the most molecules or electrons, but by who controls the hardest-to-replace materials. On that battlefield, dominance is less about volumeโ€”and more about chemistry, cost discipline, and downstream control.

ยฉ 2025 Rare Earth Exchangesโ„ข โ€“ Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.

Search
Recent Reex News

Crony Socialism-or National Security Triage? The WSJ May Be Underestimating the Emergency

From Odishaโ€™s Sands to Global Supply Chains: Indiaโ€™s Rare Earth Bet and the Challenges Ahead

The Manufacturing Comeback Won't Look Like 1952-and That's the Point

Supra Launches to Recover Gallium and Scandium From Waste - Promising Chemistry, Early-Stage Risk

Wall Street Bets on a โ€œWhite House Putโ€ for Rare Earths ? Investors Should Still Read the Fine Print

By Daniel

Inspired to launch Rare Earth Exchanges in part due to his lifelong passion for geology and mineralogy, and patriotism, to ensure America and free market economies develop their own rare earth and critical mineral supply chains.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.