Highlights

• China controls 85% of global rare earth processing capacity, creating vulnerabilities for the EU (98% import-dependent) and U.S., prompting friend-shoring strategies and policy responses like the Inflation Reduction Act.
• REE prices show 0.95 correlation with clean energy investments, tying mineral markets directly to the decarbonization pace and renewable tech demand, especially EVs and wind power.
• Ukraine emerges as a potential EU supply hub with 21 of 30 critical minerals, backed by a 2025 U.S. investment fund, offering a post-war reconstruction path and European resource independence.

---

A new study by Olena Borzenko, Tamara Panfilova, Volodymyr Haustov, Vitalina Kuryliak, and Iryna Maksymova of Ukraine’s National Academy of Sciences (opens in a new tab) explores how rare earth elements (REEs)—the building blocks of clean energy, defense, and high technology—have become both an economic lifeline and a geopolitical fault line.

Published in Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice (Vol. 5, 2025), the paper dissects the financial and policy trends that now define the rare earth market. It argues that global competition for REE dominance—driven by China’s processing monopoly and Western “friend-shoring” strategies—is reshaping not just trade flows but the architecture of global economic power.

The study also introduces Ukraine as a potential new player, whose vast reserves of lithium, graphite, titanium, and rare earths could eventually anchor Europe’s critical-mineral independence if developed through strategic investment and partnerships.

Methods and Approach

The research team combined financial modeling and geopolitical analysis to track how the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index correlates with clean-energy and technology indices.

Using correlation-regression analysis across financial benchmarks like the S&P Global Natural Resources and NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy indices (2022–2025), the authors showed how REE market fluctuations align tightly with renewable-energy growth, defense demand, and major policy events.

Complementing the quantitative work, they performed a comparative policy analysis of China, the United States, the European Union, Australia, Canada, and emerging African producers to understand how state intervention, subsidies, and trade alliances shape access to strategic minerals.

Key Findings: China’s Central Role and Emerging Shifts

The paper highlights several defining global trends:

Key Theme	Summary of Findings	Implications
China’s Dominance	China controls —60% of global REE production, 85% of processing capacity, and 37% of known reserves. The EU imports 98% of its rare earths from China, underscoring deep dependence.	China’s control over refining and separation keeps it the price-setter in global markets, leaving other economies vulnerable to export policy shifts and supply shocks.
U.S. & Allied Response	The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act and EU Critical Raw Materials Act support domestic production, while alliances such as the Minerals Security Partnership and “friend-shoring” strategies aim to diversify supply chains.	While reducing reliance on China, these measures risk market fragmentation, creating regional blocs and uneven investment flows.
Financial Sensitivity	The study finds a correlation of r = 0.95 between REE prices and clean energy investment indices—especially EV and wind power sectors.	REE prices rise and fall with clean-tech demand, linking mineral markets tightly to the pace of global decarbonization and investor sentiment in renewables.
Ukraine’s Opportunity	Ukraine holds 21 of the EU’s 30 critical minerals, including lithium, graphite, titanium, and rare earths. A 2025 U.S.–Ukraine investment fund supports joint development of these assets.	With modernization and security, Ukraine could become a strategic European supply hub, enhancing EU resource autonomy and post-war reconstruction.

Implications

For policymakers and investors, the message is clear: the global REE market is no longer governed by traditional commodity cycles but by geoeconomic strategy. State-backed investment, national security priorities, and energy-transition policies now dictate prices and trade flows. This politicization brings both risk and opportunity. For emerging producers such as Ukraine and African nations, access to capital and technology could unlock development—but without transparent governance and environmental safeguards, new dependencies could replace old ones.

Limitations and Controversies

The authors acknowledge that the study’s reliance on financial indices cannot fully capture micro-level price mechanisms or private contracts shaping REE trade. They also note that Ukraine’s potential depends on postwar reconstruction, regulatory reform, and investor trust. More broadly, the analysis raises a contentious question: can “friend-shoring” achieve resilience without reproducing monopolies under a new flag?

Conclusion

The study portrays rare earths as both the engine and the pressure point of the 21st-century energy transition. Markets now respond less to geology than to geopolitics, with China’s processing supremacy acting as the global price barometer. Yet new entrants—Ukraine among them—offer a glimpse of a more balanced and sustainable system. Building that system, the authors conclude, will require international coordination, transparent financing, and scientific modernization—not just competitive stockpiling.

Citation: Borzenko O., Panfilova T., Haustov V., Kuryliak V., Maksymova I. Financial and Economic Trends of the Rare Earth Market in Light of Global Leadership. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, Vol. 5 (64), 2025. DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.5.64.2025.4861.

©!-- /wp:paragraph -->