Green Hydrogen’s Hidden Weak Link: Rare Earths

Sep 21, 2025

Highlights

  • ฤฐsmail Hilali's study shows rare-earth price shocks can raise green hydrogen production costs by up to 9%, particularly in PEM systems.
  • China dominates rare earth mining and processing, potentially creating strategic leverage in hydrogen technology development.
  • Recommendations include:
    • Diversifying REE supply chains
    • Developing alternative technologies
    • Creating strategic materials inventories

ฤฐsmail Hilali (opens in a new tab) (Harran University) reports in a Research Square preprint (Sept 12, 2025) that rare-earth price shocksโ€”especially in neodymium, dysprosium, and terbiumโ€”can raise the levelized cost of green hydrogen (LCOH) by up to ~9%, with proton-exchange-membrane (PEM) systems most exposed.

Using an artificial-neural-network (ANN) model that outperformed ARIMA and XGBoost during high-volatility episodes (e.g., Myanmar mining disruptions, Red Sea logistics), the study links geopolitically driven REE price spikes to measurable capex/LCOH uplift, arguing hydrogen may swap oil-and-gas dependence for critical-minerals dependence unless supply chains diversify.

Why it matters (and who it favors)

Green hydrogen is capital-intensive, and PEM stacks/materials embed small but pivotal amounts of REEs. If Nd/Dy/Tb prices jump, project economics drift, financing wobbles, and deployment timetables slipโ€”particularly in import-dependent regions. Given Chinaโ€™s commanding position across mining and especially processing (the paper cites >70% extraction and ~85% processing), volatility and bottlenecks tend to entrench Beijingโ€™s leverage unless (a) non-Chinese refining capacity scales, (b) circular supply (recycling/urban mining) expands, and (c) buyers adopt smarter contracts and stockpiles. In short: without materials sovereignty, hydrogen sovereignty is a mirage.

Implications for policy and markets

  • Procurement & contracts: Expect longer-dated, floor-price or collar-style offtakes for REE-bearing components; โ€œtake-or-payโ€ structures could migrate from magnets to electrolyzer supply.
  • Capex buffers: Developers should model REE shock bands in financing cases (e.g., ยฑ10โ€“50% sensitivity on Nd/Dy/Tb), with contingency budgets sized to PEM exposure.
  • Industrial strategy: Pair hydrogen roadmaps with REE roadmapsโ€”regional separation plants, recycling targets, and strategic inventoriesโ€”so that electrolyzer build-outs arenโ€™t hostage to midstream chokepoints.
  • Tech pathways: Accelerate REE-lean alternatives (materials substitution in PEM/AEM) and diversify toward Alkaline Electrolyzer (AEL) where performance permits.

What the study got right

  • Method fit: An ANN is reasonable for non-linear, shock-driven pricing; the modelโ€™s superior error metrics versus ARIMA/XGBoost during volatility are plausible and decision-useful for stress testing.
  • Translation to LCOH: Linking REE price trajectories to stack/system costs turns abstract risk into bankable inputs (sensitivity bands, Monte Carlo)โ€”a practical step for investors.

Limitations (read before you act)

  • Preprint status: Not peer-reviewed; methods and coefficients may change.
  • Data gaps: Limited visibility into informal trade, incomplete tracking of recycling flows, and reliance on coarse proxies (e.g., a single geopolitical-risk index).
  • Generality: REE intensity varies widely by vendor and stack design; applying the paperโ€™s elasticities to all PEM/AEM/SOEC cases risks over- or under-estimating true exposure.
  • Attribution risk: Correlation between geopolitical events and price moves is shown; causality and pass-through to LCOH in real procurement contexts need validation with actual POs and contracts.

REEx bottom line

The analysis is directionally credible: REE volatility can dent hydrogen economics, advantaging Chinaโ€™s midstream until allied refining and recycling scale. Investors should demand materials-aware hydrogen models; policymakers should fund refining, recycling, and substitution in lockstep with electrolyzer targets. Otherwise, clean-energy goals will remain at the mercy of a concentrated REE pipeline.

Citation

Hilali, ฤฐ. A Foresight Study on the Geopolitical Vulnerabilities of the Rare Earth Supply Chain in Securing Green Hydrogen (opens in a new tab). Research Square preprint, Sept 12, 2025. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7309732/v1.

ยฉ!-- /wp:paragraph -->

Search
Recent Reex News

Latin America Enters the Rare Earth Crossfire

Illuminating Life: How Rare Earth Nanoparticles Are Propelling Bioimaging and Therapy

"The Rare Earth Power Struggle: India Wants Technology Transfer-But Will Others Share Industrial Secrets?"

Critical Minerals North America 2026

No Cobalt, No Jets? A Sobering Look at NATO's Materials List

By Daniel

Inspired to launch Rare Earth Exchanges in part due to his lifelong passion for geology and mineralogy, and patriotism, to ensure America and free market economies develop their own rare earth and critical mineral supply chains.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.