Highlights

• China's 2017 Polar Silk Road, framed as Arctic cooperation, increasingly targets rare earths and strategic minerals in Greenland despite U.S. and Danish security blocks.
• Russia's 2022 Ukraine invasion froze practical Polar Silk Road projects through sanctions, stalling China's main Arctic logistical backbone and active development.
• Renewed 2026 rhetoric signals Arctic rare earths remain strategically vital—Greenland's heavy rare earth deposits could reshape Western supply optionality outside China's control.

---

A January 19, 2026 analysis by China Media Project (opens in a new tab) traces the evolution—and revival—of China’s “Polar Silk Road” concept, a framework first proposed by Xi Jinping in 2017 and formalized in China’s 2018 Arctic Policy. While framed publicly as cooperation on shipping, science, and sustainability, the initiative has increasingly intersected with rare earths, Arctic minerals, and strategic geography, especially Greenland.

What’s Factual—and Why It Matters

The historical record cited is largely accurate. China did brand itself a “near-Arctic state,” sought access to the Northern Sea Route, and invested early in projects such as Russia’s Yamal LNG, where Chinese firms hold meaningful stakes. It is also correct that Greenland became a flashpoint: Chinese-linked firms pursued rare earth and infrastructure projects, only to be blocked after pressure from the United States and Denmark, citing security concerns tied to critical minerals and military proximity.

The article accurately notes that rare earths—especially heavy rare earths—sit at the center of this tension, as Greenland hosts deposits seen as potential alternatives to China-dominated supply.

Where the Narrative Leans

Chinese official responses quoted—emphasizing “international community interests,” “peaceful development,” and compliance with international law—reflect standard diplomatic language. The piece fairly reports this rhetoric but also shows how Chinese state media increasingly frames Western resistance as an “Arctic China Threat Theory,” portraying U.S. and European actions as hegemonic or diversionary. Investors should recognize this as narrative positioning, not neutral analysis.

What Changed SinceUkraine

One crucial point stands out: Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine effectively froze practical Polar Silk Road cooperation. Sanctions cut China off from Arctic projects routed through Russia, stalling what had been the initiative’s main logistical backbone. This context tempers claims that the Polar Silk Road is an active, advancing project today.

Why Rare Earth Investors Should Care

The renewed rhetoric in 2026—triggered by U.S. interest in Greenland—signals that Arctic rare earths remain strategically salient, even if development is stalled. Control over Greenland’s deposits would reshape future heavy rare earth optionality for the West. China knows this—and is signaling continued interest, even if access is constrained.

REEx Take

This is not a story about shipping lanes alone. It is about long-dated positioning for rare earth optionality in the Arctic. The Polar Silk Road is dormant, not dead. And Greenland remains the quiet prize.

Source: China Media Project, David Bandurski, Jan. 19, 2026.