Highlights
- Malaysia clarifies rare earth export terms with the U.S., emphasizing an open-door policy without exclusive access.
- The trade agreement reduces tariffs but preserves local equity rules and strategic sector control.
- Digital services tax concessions quietly accompany rare earth export clarifications, revealing complex bilateral negotiations.
Despite eye-catching headlines, Malaysia’s newly clarified rare earth export terms with the United States are not an exclusive corridor for American buyers. Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz (opens in a new tab) has made it clear: Malaysia maintains an open-door export policy for rare earth materials. The U.S. hasn’t locked in privileged access, nor has Malaysia closed off supply to others. That’s a crucial distinction for anyone betting on constrained global flows or U.S.-Malaysia bilateral monopolization.
Fact Check: The Door Swings Both Ways
According to the report in The Sun (opens in a new tab), Malaysia’s rare earth exports are unrestricted across the board. This aligns with current practice—Malaysia has never imposed national-level quotas or bans, though it has tightened environmental regulations on rare earth processing (see Lynas Malaysia’s license saga). What’s new is not preferential access, but procedural clarity: MITI will now issue Non-Preferential Certificates of Origin for U.S.-bound exports starting May 2025, a step that may enhance traceability but doesn’t alter access.
Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz, Open-Door Export Policy

Meanwhile, U.S. exports of AI chips to “certain countries” face enhanced scrutiny. This is almost certainly aimed at China and serves as a counterweight to the rare earth flow. While the article presents this as a neutral clause, it reflects an increasingly bifurcated tech-trade landscape with Malaysia caught in the middle.
What’s Real: Tariffs Down, But Sovereignty Stands
Malaysia agreed to reduce or eliminate tariffs on 98.4% of tariff lines, including key American agricultural products. But critically, it did not surrender control over strategic sectors. Local equity rules (e.g., Bumiputera ownership quotas) remain untouched, and the U.S. receives no blanket exemptions for import licensing. For observers worried Malaysia was trading away its industrial sovereignty, this clause is the fireproofing.
Reading Between the Lines: The DST Retreat
Buried in the update is a quiet win for Big Tech: Malaysia is walking back its digital services tax burden for U.S. cloud and social media firms, repealing the requirement to contribute 6% of revenues to a national connectivity fund. That raises questions—why is rare earth access paired with digital tax relief? Strategic minerals are being bundled with Silicon Valley interests, a pattern worth watching.
Final Take:
Malaysia’s message is clear: it welcomes U.S. business, but not at the expense of strategic autonomy. The West should not confuse “clarification” with “concession.”
Leave a Reply