Highlights

• The Trump administration is preparing to sign Pax Silica, a coalition framework with Singapore, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Israel to counter China's 85-90% control of rare earth processing and advanced technology supply chains.
• The declaration correctly identifies processing, separation, and magnet-making as critical choke points—not just mining—recognizing that minerals, manufacturing, and compute power are inseparable in the AI era.
• While the strategic framing marks a shift toward treating rare earths as economic security infrastructure, success depends on binding funding mechanisms and offtake guarantees rather than summit diplomacy alone.

---

According to Politico, the Trump administration is preparing to sign the Pax Silica declaration, a new coalition framework aimed at countering China’s dominance across rare earths, critical minerals, and advanced technologies. The initial participants—Singapore, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Israel—are not accidental. They sit at key junctions of processing, manufacturing, defense technology, and logistics. The ambition is large: to do for the AI era what the G7 once did for industrial capitalism.

Rare Earth Exchanges™ has been writing that tight international alliances are of paramount importance.

On paper, the declaration frames rare earth access and technology security as inseparable. That diagnosis is correct. Rare earth elements underpin magnets, sensors, power electronics, and defense systems that enable AI hardware, robotics, and quantum-adjacent technologies. In that sense, Pax Silica reflects a more mature understanding of how minerals, manufacturing, and compute power intersect.

What Rings True—and Why It Matters

The administration’s concern about China’s near-monopoly is not rhetorical. China still controls roughly 85–90% of rare earth separation, dominates downstream magnet production, and has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to use export controls as leverage. Australia and Japan already have real rare earth and magnet exposure; South Korea and Singapore anchor advanced manufacturing and trade; Israel brings dual-use tech depth. This is a rational starting set.

Equally accurate is the focus on processing and logistics, not just mining. Any coalition that ignores separation, alloying, and magnet-making is theater. Pax Silica, at least rhetorically, acknowledges the choke points that matter.

Where the Language Runs Ahead of Reality

Calling this “a game-changer” deserves scrutiny. Declarations do not build separation plants. Export-control alignment does not create a heavy rare-earth supply. And blocking China’s Belt and Road via coordinated investment screening is far easier said than executed—especially when several signatories maintain deep commercial ties with Beijing.

There is also an embedded optimism that AI-era cooperation will naturally cohere. History suggests otherwise. The West has struggled to align timelines, capital discipline, and permitting even within its own borders. Without binding funding mechanisms and long-term offtake guarantees, Pax Silica risks becoming a policy signaling exercise, not an industrial one.

The Signal Beneath the Summit

Still, this matters. What’s notable is not the rhetoric—it’s the shift in framing. Rare earths are no longer treated as a mining problem but as an economic security system. If Pax Silica evolves from summit diplomacy into contract-backed infrastructure, it could mark a genuine inflection point. If not, China’s advantage remains intact—quietly, efficiently, and undeterred.

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.