Highlights

• A new review by Qian et al. surveys proteins and peptides that selectively bind rare earth ions, offering a potentially eco-friendlier route for recovering REEs from low-grade streams like wastewater and recycling residues, though industrial solvent extraction still dominates.
• The paper synthesizes 155 references on natural and engineered REE-binding biomolecules, emphasizing that protein engineering improves selectivity and that immobilizing these binders onto solid supports creates reusable adsorbents for dilute, complex mixtures.
• Bio-based REE capture remains pre-commercial with unresolved scale-up challenges; near-term opportunities lie in targeted recovery from waste streams to reduce environmental footprint and expand domestic feedstock, requiring pilot-scale testing and standardized benchmarking.

A new review by Zixuan Qian and colleagues (including Ni He—listed by ResearchGate as affiliated with Central South University) surveys a fast-growing frontier in rare earth recovery:proteins and peptides that selectively bind rare earth ions, and thefunctional materials built by immobilizing these biomolecules onto solid supports for adsorption-based separation. The authors argue these bio-based systems could offer a more eco-friendly route for pulling rare earth elements (REEs) from low-grade streams (wastewater, dilute leachates, recycling residues), while acknowledging that today’s industrial backbone—large-scale solvent extraction—still dominates because it delivers proven throughput and purity.

Study Type and Methods

This is a review article (not a single new experiment). The team synthesizes findings across 155 references, organizing the field into: (1) how natural REE-binding biomolecules are discovered, (2) how non-natural binders are engineered or screened, and (3) how these binders are turned into practical separation materials (e.g., binders fixed onto membranes, beads, gels, and porous carriers). The paper also compares competingseparation options (ion exchange, membranes, adsorption,crystallization) and why scale-up has been difficult.

What the Review Finds

1. Nature already “knows” how to bind lanthanides. The review highlights natural REE-binding proteins (e.g., lanthanide-binding systems discovered through microbiology and proteomics), where binding strength and selectivity depend on amino-acid residues, coordination geometry, and protein microenvironments.
2. Engineering is the lever. The authors emphasize that protein engineering (tuning binding pockets and “second-shell” interactions) is central to improving selectivity—especially where competing ions like calcium can overwhelm weak binders.
3. Immobilization turns chemistry into process. By anchoring proteins/peptides to supports, researchers can translate molecular selectivity into reusable adsorbents that can capture REEs from dilute, complex mixtures—where conventionaladsorbents often fail due to poor selectivity.

 Limitations and Controversies

Bio-based REE capture remains largely pre-commercial: stability, fouling, regeneration cycles, kinetics, real-world selectivity among neighboring REEs, and cost of biomolecule production are unresolved at scale. A key controversy is over-claiming “green” replacements for solvent extraction—these materials may ultimately be best as front-end concentration/purification tools that reduce chemical load before conventional separation, not as full substitutes.

Implications and What Should Follow

For Western supply-chain resilience, the most credible near-term role is targeted recovery from waste and low-grade streams (recycling, tailings, industrial effluents), potentially lowering environmental footprint and expanding domestic feedstock options. Next steps should prioritize pilot-scale demonstrations, standardized benchmarking vs. solvent extraction, and durability testing in dirty, competitive-ion-rich streams.

Citation: Qian Z., He N., Zou K., Zhao Y., Meng X., Chen Z., Shen L., Zhao H. Rare earth elements-binding proteins/peptides and functional materials: A review. Separation and Purification Technology (2026) 137345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2026.137345 (opens in a new tab)