Highlights

• A systematic review of 35 studies reveals that while permanent magnet recycling can reduce environmental impact by 18–96%, current global recycling rates remain at just 1% due to complex chemistry, long product lifecycles, and weak collection infrastructure.
• REE production in permanent magnets accounts for 50–99% of total lifecycle environmental impact, with China controlling up to 90% of refining and magnet production, creating significant environmental and geopolitical supply chain risks.
• Direct “magnet-to-magnet” recycling offers the lowest emissions profile, but some indirect recycling methods can produce higher emissions than primary production, highlighting that not all recycling pathways deliver net environmental benefits.

---

A new systematic review led by Giulia Cortina of the University of Florence, alongside Maurizio Guadagno, Lorenzo Berzi, and Massimo Delogu, offers a clear-eyed assessment of rare earth elements (REEs) in permanent magnets—the critical components powering electric vehicles, wind turbines, and advanced electronics. Synthesizing 35 rigorously selected studies from an initial pool of over 850, the authors conclude that while recycling rare earth magnets can materially reduce environmental impact and supply risk, current technologies remain fragmented, inefficient, and far from industrial scale. The central paradox is unavoidable: the materials enabling the global energy transition impose significant environmental costs, and recycling—though promising—has yet to mature into a dependable, system-level solution.

Study Design: A Structured Look Across the Evidence Base

The authors employ a systematic review methodology, drawing from major scientific databases (Scopus, IEEE, Web of Science, Springer). After multiple screening stages, 35 studies were selected to address two core questions:

• What are the lifecycle environmental impacts of REEs in permanent magnets?
• To what extent can recycling mitigate those impacts?

The analysis integrates Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) frameworks, allowing comparison across extraction, processing, use, and end-of-life phases.

Key Findings: High Impact Materials, Incomplete Circularity

1. Environmental Burden Concentrated Upstream

REE production—especially for NdFeB magnets—accounts for 50% to 99% of total lifecycle environmental impact, depending on the supply chain configuration.

Key drivers include:

• Energy-intensive extraction and refining
• Chemical-intensive separation processes
• Waste streams, including toxic effluents and radioactive byproducts

The supply chain remains highly concentrated, with China controlling roughly 60–70% of mining, ~90% of refining, and up to 85–90% of magnet production, reinforcing both environmental and geopolitical risk.

2. Recycling Potential Is Real—but Structurally Constrained

Despite its promise, global REE recycling rates remain around 1%.

Core constraints include:

• Complex magnet chemistry and difficult separation
• Long product lifecycles (8–30 years), delaying feedstock availability
• Weak collection, sorting, and disassembly infrastructure

Two dominant pathways emerge:

• Direct recycling (“magnet-to-magnet”)
• Lowest emissions profile
• Preserves material performance
• Indirect recycling (hydro-, pyro-, electro-, bio-metallurgical)
• More flexible but energy- and reagent-intensive

Depending on the process, emissions reductions range from ~18% to as high as 96%, though results vary significantly by methodology and scale.

3. Not All Recycling Pathways Deliver Net Benefits

A critical nuance: some recycling routes—particularly double salt precipitation—can produce higher emissions than primary production.

Likewise, REE-free alternatives (e.g., ferrite magnets) reduce environmental burden but may introduce trade-offs in efficiency, size, or system design.

Study Limitations: Fragmented Data, Uneven Comparability

The authors emphasize that the evidence base remains constrained by:

• Incomplete and non-transparent industrial data (especially from China)
• Limited inclusion of illegal or informal mining impacts
• Inconsistent LCA methodologies across studies
• Partial lifecycle coverage in many analyses

These gaps introduce significant uncertainty and limit direct comparability across technologies.

Implications: Recycling Alone Will Not Solve the Supply Chain Problem

This study reinforces a core REEx insight: the rare earth challenge is fundamentally a midstream and systems problem—not just a mining issue.

Strategic Takeaways:

• Recycling is necessary—but insufficient on its own
• Product design (especially for disassembly) is a major leverage point
• Policy frameworks will determine economic viability
• Supply chain diversification remains urgent

For investors and policymakers, the message is pragmatic: recycling will play a role, but it does not yet represent a scalable substitute for primary supply.

What Comes Next: From Lab Innovation to Industrial Systems

The authors call for coordinated action across:

• Scalable, lower-impact separation technologies
• Dedicated collection and recycling infrastructure
• Standardized and transparent lifecycle data
• Integration of economic and social dimensions into future analyses

Without system-level alignment, recycling risks remaining technologically promising but commercially marginal.

A Circular Vision Still Under Construction

Rare earth recycling sits at the intersection of environmental necessity and industrial reality. While the technical pathways exist and the environmental upside is clear, execution at scale remains elusive. Until infrastructure, economics, and policy converge, the circular economy for rare earths will remain more aspiration than operational backbone.

Source: Cortina, G. et al., Environmental Impact and Recycling Routes of Rare Earth Elements in Permanent Magnets, University of Florence (2026)