Breaking Down China’s Rare Earth Monopoly: Why Western Companies Struggle and What Can Be Done?

Highlights

• China controls over 80% of global rare earth processing, leveraging economic and geopolitical advantages through strategic long-term investments.
• Western countries face significant challenges in rare earth production, including high processing costs, environmental regulations, and technological barriers.
• Breaking China’s grip requires massive government subsidies, international partnerships, and innovative solutions to develop a resilient, independent rare earth supply chain.

---

Rare earth elements, the building blocks of modern technology, are essential to everything from electric vehicles to smartphones to advanced defense systems. Despite their name, these materials are not rare, but the ability to mine, process, and refine them economically is highly concentrated. Over the past few decades, China has established itself as the dominant force in the rare earth industry, controlling over 80% of the global supply chain. Western companies in North America, Europe, and Australia struggle to compete, and the reasons go beyond the surface.

Why China?

China’s dominance stems from its strategic investment in rare earth processing capabilities decades ago. Processing rare earths is an expensive and complex chemical process that produces significant environmental waste.

Starting in the 1980s, China recognized the importance of rare earths and aggressively developed the infrastructure to mine and refine these materials while tolerating environmental costs that would be unacceptable in most Western countries. By subsidizing production, China undercut competitors, driving companies in the United States and elsewhere out of business. For instance, the Mountain Pass mine in California—the only significant rare earth mine in the U.S.—was forced to close temporarily because it couldn’t compete with China’s low costs.

What are the Challenges for the West?

The challenges for Western companies are numerous. First, the processing technology requires large-scale facilities and years of expertise, both of which China has mastered. Second, environmental regulations in the West make it expensive and difficult to process rare earths domestically. Finally, China uses its dominance as a geopolitical tool, leveraging its control over the supply chain to influence international trade. Western industries that rely on rare earths, like automotive and defense, are left vulnerable to supply disruptions.

Breaking the Grip

So, how can the West break China’s grip on this critical sector? One solution is for the government to invest in rare earth processing infrastructure. For example, the U.S. and Australia have begun funding new facilities and partnerships to expand their capabilities. Another approach is recycling rare earths from electronic waste, reducing reliance on mined materials. Additionally, technological innovation could simplify processing methods, lowering costs and minimizing environmental damage. Building strong alliances among Western nations to share resources and expertise is also essential to countering China’s monopoly.

A Wake-Up Call

The West, including American defense contractors, federal agencies, and some elected officials, is waking up to the dangers of relying on China for rare earth elements. However, building a resilient supply chain will take years of focused effort. Rare earths are essential for technologies like electric vehicles, wind turbines, and advanced defense systems. Yet, with over 80% of global rare earth processing controlled by China, Western countries face a dilemma: how to break free of China’s grip without destabilizing critical industries in the process.

A free-market approach seems unlikely to succeed in the short to intermediate term. Rare earth processing is an expensive, capital-intensive endeavor fraught with regulatory hurdles and environmental challenges. Unlike China, which heavily subsidized its rare earth industry for decades and accepted significant environmental costs, Western companies cannot compete purely on market principles. Environmental regulations, higher labor costs, and the lack of established infrastructure make private investment alone inadequate to build a competitive supply chain. For this reason, massive government subsidies and intervention are likely necessary to level the playing field.

The U.S., Australia, and European countries are beginning to fund rare earth projects, but these efforts are still in their infancy, and far more will need to be done. Recycling rare earths from electronic waste is another promising avenue, but it’s not a quick fix. While it could eventually reduce reliance on mining, the technology and systems for large-scale recycling remain underdeveloped. To date, only about 1% of all rare earth elements are derived from recycled materials.

Similarly, technological innovation in processing methods could simplify the complex and toxic refining process, but breakthroughs take time. Even with significant investment, these efforts may take a decade or more to materialize into a fully independent supply chain.

Some suggest an alternative: negotiating directly with China to ensure a consistent and rationally priced supply of rare earths. For instance, a leader like former President Trump could conceivably broker a high-stakes strategic deal with Beijing, guaranteeing stable exports to American firms.  This would be a Trump-like move.  While this approach could provide short-term relief, it raises significant questions. Given its history of using rare earths as a geopolitical weapon, can China be trusted to honor such agreements? In 2010, for example, China cut off rare earth exports to Japan during a territorial dispute, demonstrating its willingness to exploit its dominance for political leverage. A deal with China might only delay the inevitable need for self-reliance while exposing Western industries to continued vulnerabilities.

Realities Moving Forward

The West’s best hope lies in a combination of strategic investment, innovation, and international collaboration. Countries like the U.S. and Australia must commit to building the infrastructure and expertise needed to process rare earths domestically. Strong alliances, such as the Quad (comprising the U.S., Australia, Japan, and India), could pool resources and knowledge to develop an integrated supply chain. These steps, however, require not only money but also political will, patience, and a shared vision of long-term resilience.

In the end, the road to rare earth independence will not be easy or quick. Free-market solutions are insufficient (at least in the short to intermediate run), and any reliance on China leaves the West vulnerable to manipulation.   Thus, massive government subsidies, strategic partnerships, and bold innovation will be necessary to secure a future where rare earths are no longer a tool of geopolitical power but a resource managed in the interest of global stability and progress.

The rare earth industry is a cornerstone of future technologies and global security. While the road to competing with China is difficult, strategic investments, international collaboration, and innovative solutions can create a more balanced and secure supply chain for these vital materials.