Highlights

• China Daily frames German foreign minister's Beijing visit as an opportunity for pragmatic cooperation.
• The visit subtly emphasizes China's rare earth licensing regime with selective exemptions as diplomatic leverage.
• Commentary presents the licensing system as administrative openness while masking its discretionary nature.
• This creates supply-chain conditionality that rewards alignment and punishes deviation.
• Germany's response, as an EU bellwether, will determine rare earth risk premiums.
• State messaging signals that access remains available but not automatic for foreign manufacturers.

---

An opinion piece by Li Yang, published in China Daily, frames German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul’s visit to Beijing as a moment for Berlin to “take an objective view” of a cooperative China–Germany relationship. The essay’s tone is conciliatory, urging pragmatism, dialogue, and restraint within EU-China policy. Yet for rare earth watchers, the most telling passage is subtle: Beijing’s reminder that it is “gradually applying a general licensing system” for rare earths—paired with selective exemptions such as Nexperia-related chip exports.

That pairing is not accidental. It is diplomacy with a material subtext.

What Holds Up Under Supply-Chain Scrutiny

The article accurately notes Germany’s deep economic exposure to China and its outsized role in EU policymaking. German firms remain heavily embedded in Chinese manufacturing ecosystems, including sectors that depend on rare earth oxides, alloys, and permanent magnets. It is also correct that China has shifted from blanket controls to licensing-based management in sensitive materials—an approach that allows flexibility without surrendering leverage.

The cited confidence survey from the German Chamber of Commerce in China—showing a majority of firms planning to increase investment—aligns with broader business sentiment: commercial ties persist despite geopolitical friction. For manufacturers, continuity matters.

Where the Framing Leans

This is state-aligned commentary, and the bias is visible in what is emphasized and what is softened. The piece presents China’s licensing regime as evidence of openness, while omitting the discretionary nature of licensing and the asymmetry it creates for foreign buyers. Rare earth controls are framed as administrative normalization rather than policy instruments that can be tightened or relaxed at will.

Likewise, calls for Germany to resist “politicization” and “securitization” sidestep the reality that supply-chain security has become a legitimate policy concern—especially after past disruptions. The implication that cooperation alone can offset “external shocks” underplays structural dependencies.

Why This Matters for Rare Earth Markets

What’s notable is how rare earths are invoked as reassurance rather than threat. Unlike overt warnings elsewhere, this piece signals that access is possible—conditional on alignment. For investors and manufacturers, that conditionality is the point. Licensing regimes reward predictability; they also punish deviation.

Germany’s role as a bellwether for EU policy means these signals ripple outward. If Berlin reads cooperation as stability, rare earth risk premiums may compress. If not, they widen—quietly.

The Takeaway

China Daily’s message is less about persuasion than positioning: access remains open, but not automatic. In rare earths, reassurance and leverage often travel together.

• Rare Earth Exchanges™ reminds all that China Daily is a state-owned media and all information should be verified by multiple sources.

Source: Li Yang, China Daily (Opinion Line), Dec. 12, 2025.

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.