Highlights
- Researchers from Queen's University and partner institutions developed a 'Tai Chi' sustainability model.
- The model links two pathways: mining and recycling.
- It involves four actors and eight forces to analyze rare earth supply chain security.
- The model identifies midstream separation, metals, and magnets as critical chokepoints.
- A 'trifecta of durability' emphasizes:
- Midstream scarcity
- Circular feedstock premium for recycling
- Policy coupling with ESG guardrails
- These are essential for secure rare earth supply chains beyond simply opening new mines.
- Winners in the rare earth sector will:
- Demonstrate full conversion capability from oxides to metals to magnets
- Provide transparent life-cycle assessments
- Emphasis is on recycling scaling and advances in cleaner hydrometallurgy, not just resource tonnage.
Tian-Yu Zhao, PhD (opens in a new tab), Queen’s University, with co-authors from Zhengzhou University, Central South University, and the University of Toronto, investigates a wide-angle review of rare earth chemistry, applications, resources, environmental challenges, and policy. The study team incorporated a “Tai Chi” sustainability model linking two pathways (mining, recycling), four actors (governments, enterprises, researchers, consumers), and eight forces (resources, energy, environment, policy, applications, technology, supply-demand, economy).
What are the outcomes of this process?
REEs are indispensable; China remains central; durable security requires coordinated mine-to-magnet-to-recycling execution, not just new mines in what the authors refer to as a trifecta of durability.
This trifecta of durability includes the following:
| Elements | Description |
|---|---|
| Midstream scarcity | Separation, metals, alloys, and magnets remain the chokepoints |
| Circular feedstock premium | Credible recycling and by-product recovery should command higher multiple, |
| Policy coupling | Incentives must travel with ESG guardrails—or ramps stall. |
The Tai Chi model treats the supply chain as an interactive system (not silos), making it a practical frame for diligence and scenario planning.
Fresh Signals: Moniring
The authors synthesize progress on ion-adsorption clays, cleaner hydrometallurgy, and rising REE intensity in energy/defense. For North American and European rebuilds, watch:
- Proof that recycling scales beyond pilot yields.
- Lower reagent/energy intensity at commercial plants;
- Transparent life-cycle assessments (LCA) to de-risk ESG.
Issuer disclosures that link feed (ore/scrap) to separated oxides to metal/alloy to magnets, with named offtakes, should earn valuation premiums.
Be Sure to Read the Fine Print
This is a review, not new primary data. Sources vary by method and time; some figures are region-specific. The Tai Chi model is a conceptual tool—it does not forecast prices or guarantee permitting timelines. Country-level claims (reserves, “dominance”) need date stamps and policy context.
REEx verdict—Pragmatic Optimism
We agree with the core thesis: security demands balanced growth in mining and recycling, plus midstream build-out under clear policy.
Perhaps treat the Tai Chi model like a diligence checklist: map each issuer to the two pathways, four actors, eight forces; score execution risk node-by-node; discount for ESG and commissioning-curve realities. Winners will show conversion capability (oxides → metals → magnets) and measured LCAs, not just resource tonnage.
Citation: Zhao, T-Y., Li, W-L., Kelebek, S., et al. “A comprehensive review on rare earth elements: resources, technologies, applications, and prospects.” Rare Metals 44, 7011–7040 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-025-03459-9 (opens in a new tab)
© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ – Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Acrossthe Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.
0 Comments