Highlights

• Thai King's Beijing visit showcased China's immersive developmental approach—EVs, AI, rail, and smart farming—masking deeper integration into Chinese-controlled critical mineral and technology supply chains.
• China's charm offensive contrasts sharply with U.S. transactional strategy: while Washington secures MoUs preventing export bans, Beijing offers infrastructure, technology stacks, and long-term market demand.
• China Daily's narrative celebrates bilateral cooperation without addressing technology dependence, data governance risks, or China's rare earth dominance underpinning these 'future industries.'

---

How about soft power plus hard metals? Recently, Thai King Vajiralongkorn visited Beijing, according to state media (opens in a new tab) China Daily, representing a warmwatercolor of “one family” ties: polar science, smart farming, AI, high-speed rail, EVs, and youth exchanges. It is classic Chinese soft-power storytelling—culture, cooperation, and climate, not cobalt, copper, or rare earths.

But under the diplomatic poetry sits an unmistakable industrial agenda. EVs, AI, satellites, and high-speed rail all consume NdPr magnets, battery metals, sensors, and advanced semiconductors. Deepening China–Thailand integration in these sectors almost certainly implies tighter anchoring of Thai industry to Chinese-controlled supply chains for critical minerals and technology.

Two Playbooks in ASEAN: Charm vs. Contracts

Contrast this with Donald Trump’s recent ASEAN swing, where Washington inked MoUs and trade pledges with Malaysia, Thailand, Japan, and others to diversify critical mineral supply chains away from China. Malaysia, for example, agreed not to ban or impose quotas on exports of critical minerals and rare earth magnets to the U.S., even as it maintains a ban on raw rare earth exports and courts Chinese refinery investment.

The U.S. approach is transactional and defensive: lock in supply, prevent future export controls, and create tariff-mediated incentives. China’s approach, on full display in the China Daily account, is immersive and developmental: railways, AI labs, space projects, smart tractors, and consumer brands like Red Bull’s TCP leaning into “certainty” in China’s market. One offers contracts and tariffs; the other offers infrastructure, technology stacks, and long-term demand.  What’s going to be taken more seriously?

Where the Story Rings True—and Where It Glows

First, what’s credible. China is Thailand’s largest trading partner and top market for Thai agricultural exports; bilateral trade of nearly $114 billion is plausible and directionally consistent with other sources. Chinese EV and tech firms (BYD, Great Wall, Huawei, Xiaomi) really are expanding aggressively into Thailand’s consumer and industrial sectors.

Omitted intentionally or not was the lack of mention of technology dependence, data governance, or strategic leverage that may follow deep integration in AI, rail, and EV supply chains.  Plus, no discussion of how China’s rare-earth dominance underpins many of these “future industries,” or of ASEAN hedging with new U.S. and Japanese critical-minerals deals.

While the China Daily piece is not misinformation, it is a one-sided narrative—a celebration without risk analysis.

Disclaimer: China Daily is an English-language newspaper owned by the Chinese Communist Party, and is widely regarded as a state propaganda outlet; all claims require independent, third-party verification.

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™ –Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the RareEarth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.