Highlights
- China maintains unchallenged control over 90% of global rare earth refining and near-total dominance of heavy rare earths critical for defense and EVs, particularly from Ganzhou.
- Despite US$8.5 billion Western investments and diplomatic truces, no viable heavy rare earth supply chain exists outside China, exposing a dangerous gap between political ambition and industrial reality.
- Short-term trade agreements don't neutralize long-term supply risksโinvestors must focus on who will supply dysprosium and terbium to Western defense programs before 2030.
A new AFP/Malay Mail report (opens in a new tab) paints a familiar picture: Chinaโs decades-long rise to rare earth supremacy has become an economic weapon in the Sino-American trade war. The piece is broadly accurateโbut not complete. For Rare Earth Exchanges readers, the goal is to separate geopolitical theater from supply-chain reality, and to translate the headlines into investor-relevant clarity.
Table of Contents
The Empire Built Quietly: Chinaโs Heavy Rare Earth Stronghold
The report accurately confirms the industryโs hard facts:
- China controls ~66% of global mining, ~90% of global refining, and near-total separation for Dy, Tb, Y, and other heaviesโcritical for EV motors, radars, and aerospace systems.
- Ganzhou remains the worldโs most important source of heavy rare earths, as the AFP team witnessed trucks moving in and out of mines and processing plantsโa rare window into an industry normally off-limits.
All of this aligns with REEx models: China remains unchallenged in heavy rare earth value chains. Western supply growth remains a light rare earth story for now.
Where the Story Drifts: The Trade War, the Truce, and the โGuaranteed Supplyโ Narrative
Here, the article steps into softer ground. AFP frames TrumpโXiโs one-year โtruceโ as a guarantee of mineral supply. Investors should treat that language carefully.
Guarantees from China in strategic minerals are policy levers, not promises. Export restrictions in October already rattled global manufacturers, and Beijingโs future decisions will be tactical, not contractual. The article is technically correct that China uses rare earths as a bargaining tool, but it overlooks that short-term truces do not neutralize long-term dependency risk.
This is the missing investor context.
And REEx notes that the media is somehow influenced by China, or for that matter, a victorious narrative out of Washington DC establishes an artificial and not necessarily accurate relaxation. More industrial policy is necessary in the West to achieve resilience of the supply chain within a decade.
Western Acceleration: Real Progress or Political Pageantry?
AFP notes major U.S. moves:
- A US$8.5B critical minerals package with Australia.
- New agreements with Japan, Malaysia, and Thailand.
DoDโs โmine-to-magnet by 2027โ mandate (this is nearly certainly going to be extended)
All true. But the article avoids the harder question: Are these actions enough to break Chinaโs monopoly? REExโs assessment: not yet. Heavy rare earths remain unaddressed, and most Western projects still rely on Chinese separation technology or off-take channels.ย The West needs a more comprehensive, durable, and integrated industrial policy.
What This Means for Investors: Interpret the HeadlinesโDonโt Inhale Them
The AFP piece is accurate but incomplete. It describes Chinaโs dominance; it underplays how deeply structural that dominance is. For rare earth investors, the real story is the widening gap between Western ambition and industrial execution.
Key unanswered questions:
- Who will supply heavies (Dy/Tb) to U.S. defense programs between now and 2030?
- What about all of the infrastructure necessary for true rebuilding of the supply chain (see our article on the Chip sector situation in Arizona)
- How enforceable is a โtruceโ in a commodity China controls 90% of?
- Which Western projects can scale separation without Chinese technology?
These are the investment triggersโnot diplomatic headlines.
ยฉ 2025 Rare Earth Exchangesโข โ Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.
0 Comments