Highlights

• China dominates the rare earth supply chain with approximately:
  • 70% of mining
  • 90% of separation
  • 93% of magnet manufacturing. Making magnets—not mining—is the true strategic bottleneck.
• Sky News correctly identifies rare earth magnets as critical for:
  • Electric Vehicles (EVs)
  • Defense
  • Robotics
• However, they oversimplify U.S. leverage and omit the heavy rare earth (Dysprosium/Terbium) supply crisis.
• Real solutions require comprehensive mine-to-magnet infrastructure, including:
  • Funded separation plants
  • Bankable offtake contracts
  • Streamlined permitting
  • Scaling recycling
  • Workforce development
• Tariffs alone are insufficient.
  

---

Sky News’ recent explainer (opens in a new tab) gets the essentials right: rare earths are the invisible sinew of modern power—NdFeB magnets in EV motors and robots, yttria (yttrium) keeping jet-engine blades from wilting, and Dy/Tb (dysprosium/terbium) unlocking high-temperature performance. Most crucially, the choke point isn’t rock in the ground—it’s the refining, metals, alloys, and magnet making that China industrialized while others blinked. Beijing now anchors roughly 70% of mining, ~90% of separation, and ~93% of magnet manufacturing—the commanding heights of “mine-to-magnet.”

Where the film truly shines is clarity: magnets are the value center; defense rides on them; so do factories filled with servo motors and the pocket speakers in your earbuds. It also calls out a hard truth: the chemistry is dirty, complex, and energy-intensive, a prime reason the West outsourced it, then woke up to dependency.

But several beats drift from reality:

• “Most EVs use rare-earth magnets.” Many do—but not all. Induction and switched-reluctance motors (no REEs) remain credible paths; OEMs mix architectures for cost, drag, and efficiency. NdFeB may be winning share, but it’s not universal.
• Emissions certainty. The graphic implying neodymium’s per-kg CO₂ is “highest of all metals” needs scope and source. LCAs vary by ore, reagents, and unit boundary (oxide vs. metal vs. magnet). Direction: right. Precision: uncited and likely overstated.
• The Spruce Pine symmetry. Ultra-high-purity quartz from North Carolina matters for crucibles/wafer routes, but it’s not a China-style chokehold; alternatives and process workarounds exist. Equating U.S. quartz leverage with China’s mine-to-magnet stack is narrative poetry, not industrial arithmetic.

What’s Missing—and Mission-Critical

• Heavy REEs are the real cliff. High-temp magnet grades often need Dy/Tb; supply is thin, substitution tricky, and diffusion tech is still scaling. Any sober plan must front-load HREE security.
• Non-China capacity is growing—slowly. Australia, EU, Japan, India, and the U.S. are funding separation trains, alloys, magnet plants, and recycling, but today’s tonnage can’t backstop a shock. Recent Chinese export-license friction underscores how fragile the system remains.
• Bayan Obo’s externalities aren’t footnotes. The tailings lakes and leach legacies are the cost curve—and the political hurdle—for any “on-shoring” push.

Overall, Sky News is even-handed on China’s dominance and U.S. tariffs, but it over-simplifies leverage (Spruce Pine ≠ Bayan Obo) and leans on an uncited emissions claim. On the policy ask, it gestures at geopolitics more than build-cards.

Is the call for industrial policy strong enough?

No. Tariffs don’t produce magnets. A real plan is prosaic but potent:

1. Mine-to-magnet scaffolding: co-fund LREE/HREE separation, metals/alloys, and sintered & bonded magnet lines;
2. Bankable demand: DoD/DOE & EU contracts, price floors, insurance;
3. Permitting & ESG: time-bounded approvals, tailings standards, community revenue-sharing;
4. Recycling at scale: recover NdPr/Dy/Tb from motors/HDDs;
5. People & kit: solvent-extraction talent, hydromet control, and test rigs—today’s true bottlenecks.

Bottom line

Sky News (opens in a new tab) offers a lucid primer and gets the stakes right—magnets are where the game is won. But the fix isn’t a tariff reel or a quartz countermove; it’s a grind of pipe, plant, people, and offtakes. Until that’s banked, the world’s supply chain still turns on a license stamp in Beijing.

©!-- /wp:paragraph -->