Highlights
- The U.S. is using the FAST-41 permitting program to expedite domestic mining and reduce dependence on China’s critical mineral production.
- Currently, China controls 60% of global critical mineral production and 85% of processing capacity, driving urgency for U.S. mineral independence.
- The program aims to reduce mine development timelines from potentially 29 years to a more competitive timeframe.
- It supports clean energy and defense supply chains.
In a strategic pivot to reduce U.S. reliance on China for rare earth elements and other critical minerals, the Trump administration is leveraging the FAST-41 permitting program, (opens in a new tab)originally launched under President Obama, to expedite the development of domestic mining and processing projects. As reported (opens in a new tab) by Maydeen Merino of the Washington Examiner, the goal is clear: accelerate U.S. self-reliance in clean energy, defense, and high-tech supply chains.
FAST-41, now under the leadership of Emily Domenech, (opens in a new tab) is being repositioned to act as a “sherpa” for critical minerals projects, establishing timelines and coordinating across agencies to overcome bureaucratic inertia. While the program already includes six covered mining projects, including Graphite One in Alaska, it also tracks an additional 25 transparency projects through a public dashboard.
The urgency is driven by China’s dominance, which currently controls 60% of global critical mineral production and 85% of processing capacity. With China tightening export controls and increasing geopolitical leverage, the U.S. is under pressure to act fast.
Domenech noted that without reform, it could take up to 29 years to bring a mine online in the United States. Her mandate is to change that.
REEx raises some key questions for investors.
| REEx Question | Points for Consideration |
|---|---|
| FAST-41 Impact in context of trade war and China export controls? | Will FAST-41 materially accelerate timelines, or merely improve optics? |
| Accessibility for upstarts, small-cap miners? | Can small-cap miners access FAST-41’s full benefits, or is it tailored for mid-to-large players? |
| Does this work absent rare earth element industrial policy? | Is permitting acceleration enough without downstream processing investment? |
| Is Washington politics supportive? | How resilient is bipartisan support, especially if political power shifts again in 2028? |
While the FAST-41 relaunch is a positive signal, retail investors should track which projects move from transparency status to full permitting and construction, and which companies secure real offtake deals or infrastructure funding. The window for U.S. mineral independence is short—and closing.
Leave a Reply