Trump’s Tariffs and the New Global Order-Hungarian Economists Warn of “Geoeconomic Realignment”

Oct 17, 2025

Highlights

  • Hungarian economists warn that Trump's 2025 tariff blitz marks the end of hyper-globalization, shifting trade toward geoeconomic competition where policies align with national security over market efficiency.
  • China's dominance of 60-80% of global rare earth supply, 40% of science degrees, and one-third of IT engineers gives Beijing strategic leverage as supply chains re-regionalize under tariff pressures.
  • Rising sovereign debt and fiscal strain are driving monetary reform experimentsโ€”CBDCs, yield-curve control, and central bank gold accumulationโ€”as governments finance industrial policy in the new era.

In a July 2025 roundtable hosted by the Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC) and the Hungarian Economic Association (MKT), moderated by Pรกl Pรฉter Kolozsi of the Government Debt Management Agency, leading economists warned that Donald Trumpโ€™s revived tariff war is redrawing the worldโ€™s financial and industrial map. The eventโ€”titled โ€œTrumpโ€™s Tariff Policy and the Reshaping of the World Order: The End of Orthodoxy or the Beginning of the New Normal?โ€โ€”was summarized in the Financial and Economic Review (Vol. 24, Issue 3, Sept 2025).

Panelists, including Gyula Pleschinger, Zoltรกn Pogรกtsa, Gรฉza Sebestyรฉn, and Barnabรกs Virรกg, argued that Trumpโ€™s 2025 tariff blitz, launched on April 2 and briefly suspended in July, has triggered a global chain reaction: Chinaโ€™s export restrictions on rare earths and digital retaliation from Canada and others mark a shift from open markets toward a new age of geoeconomic competition.

The End of โ€œHyper-Globalizationโ€

Speakers agreed that the post-1947 era of declining tariffs and expanding free trade has ended. What follows may not be protectionism per seโ€”but a selective decoupling of strategic sectors. As Pleschinger observed, U.S. policy now grants preferential tariffs to allies and punitive tariffs to rivals, signaling an era in which trade aligns with national security.

Sebestyรฉn linked this trend to a broader โ€œsecurity-driven capitalism,โ€ in which investment decisions follow geopolitical logic rather than market efficiencyโ€”a pattern reminiscent of the 1980s U.S.โ€“Japan rivalry.

The Rare Earths Factor

For Rare Earth Exchanges readers, Deputy Central Bank Governor Barnabรกs Virรกgโ€™s remarks hit closest to home: โ€œ_The outcome of the U.S.โ€“China rivalry will depend on who controls scarce resourcesโ€”rare earth metals, human capital, and data._โ€

He cited Chinaโ€™s commanding positionโ€”60โ€“80 percent of global rare earth supply, 40 percent of science degrees, and one-third of the worldโ€™s IT engineers. These asymmetries, he warned, give Beijing a formidable advantage as supply chains re-regionalize under tariff and security pressures.

Fiscal Strains and Monetary Shifts

Panelists linked rising tariffs to mounting fiscal and monetary fragility. Sovereign debt in advanced economies has climbed from roughly 40 percent of GDP in the 1970s to over 110 percent today, while debt-service costs now exceed defense spending in many nations.

Virรกg and Pogรกtsa both suggested that monetary reformโ€”central-bank digital currencies, yield-curve control, and targeted credit systemsโ€”may define the next decade, as governments seek to finance industrial policy without triggering crises.

Gold, too, is quietly re-entering the monetary conversation, as central banks diversify away from the dollarโ€”what Pogรกtsa called โ€œa paradigm shift akin to the tariff war itself.โ€

Limitations and Context

The roundtableโ€™s conclusions, while provocative, reflect a Central European vantage pointโ€”a region dependent on both Western capital and Eastern markets. The emphasis on sovereignty and โ€œmonetary nationalismโ€ may overstate near-term fragmentation, yet the trajectory is unmistakable: trade and finance are no longer neutral.

Conclusion

From Budapestโ€™s policy halls to Washingtonโ€™s tariff tables, a new world order is taking shapeโ€”one defined by controlled supply chains, resource nationalism, and financial experimentation. For rare earth investors and industrial planners, the takeaway is clear: geopolitics now shapes the periodic table.

Citation: Kolozsi, Pรกl Pรฉter (2025). โ€œReport on the Roundtable Talk: Trumpโ€™s Tariff Policy and the Reshaping of the World Order โ€“ The End of Orthodoxy or the Beginning of the New Normal?โ€ Financial and Economic Review, Vol. 24 (3): 141โ€“146.

ยฉ!-- /wp:paragraph -->

Search
Recent Reex News

Who Owns Malawi's Rare Earths? An Offshore Shuffle Raises Hard Questions for Investors

The Paradox of Visibility: Why Capital Chases AI-and Undervalues the Minerals That Power It

Japan Digs Six Kilometers Deep for Rare Earths-A Strategic Signal, Not a Supply Solution

Two Green Mining Breakthroughs Highlight Advances in Smart Processing and Tailings Management

From Ore to Rulebook: Ganzhou Moves Up the Rare Earth Power Stack

By Daniel

Inspired to launch Rare Earth Exchanges in part due to his lifelong passion for geology and mineralogy, and patriotism, to ensure America and free market economies develop their own rare earth and critical mineral supply chains.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.