War Games, Hypersonics, and the Rare Earth Reality Behind a Taiwan Crisis

Dec 10, 2025

Highlights

  • Classified U.S. war games show China defeating American forces in Taiwan scenarios, highlighting a vulnerability in industrial base mismatch rather than just tactics.
  • China's missile and drone superiority is tied to its dominance over critical minerals, such as neodymium, dysprosium, gallium, and its magnet production capacity.
  • Expect an accelerated U.S. policy response, including:
    • Defense Production Act funding
    • Magnet contracts
    • Emergency stockpiling
    • Friend-shoring to address the materials gap

A top-secret U.S. “Overmatch Brief,” described by the New York Times (opens in a new tab) editorial board, paints a consistent picture of classified war games in which China defeats U.S. forces in a Taiwan conflict. The headlines are cinematic—carrier groups obliterated, hypersonic salvos overwhelming American defenses, and trillion-dollar platforms outpaced by cheaper mass-produced systems.

This kind of reporting grabs attention, but for rare earth and critical-minerals observers, the real story is not the hypothetical battle. It is the industrial base mismatch beneath it—because modern warfare is won not only on the sea or in the air but inside refineries, separation plants, metallization shops, magnet factories, and drone-assembly lines.

Signals Amid the Noise: What the Article Gets Right

The UK-based Telegraph (opens in a new tab), drawing on the New York Times Overmatch coverage, tracks with long-running Pentagon and think-tank analyses: U.S. blue-water fleets and forward bases face growing risk from China’s anti-access/area-denial missile systems.

China today fields a large arsenal of short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic and cruise missiles, and Beijing’s investments in hypersonic systems are real and well documented. The reporting also echoes official concern that America has a structural disadvantage in rapid mass-manufacturing of munitions and platforms, an issue that has become visible as artillery shells, interceptors, and long-range fires have come under pressure after years of supplying Ukraine and supporting Middle East contingencies.

Where the Story Leans Harder Than the Evidence

The claim that “China would defeat the U.S.” remains more interpretive than definitive. War-game outcomes vary with the scenario, timelines, red-team assumptions, and allied participation. Statements such as “we lose every time” are rhetorically powerful—useful for driving reform and budgets, less reliable as a deterministic forecast.

The hypersonic “carrier-killer” narrative is similar: hypersonics are hard to intercept on paper, but their performance against sophisticated navies in real war is still untested. The United States also has far more recent large-scale combat experience than the PLA, a factor that simulations struggle to fully encode. That’s just a fact.

The Rare Earth and Industrial Base Angle: The Real Strategic Battleground

Here is the real relevance for Rare Earth Exchanges readers: China’s missile and drone advantage is inseparable from its materials advantage. Modern hypersonic systems, precision-guided missiles, quiet submarine motors, and drone swarms typically rely on high-performance permanent magnets built with rare earths such as neodymium, dysprosium, terbium, and samarium, as well as gallium, titanium sponge, tungsten, and other specialty alloys—domains China still dominates from mining through refining to magnet production.

The U.S. faces a material-to-manufacturing bottleneck: even if Congress authorizes more drones, missiles, or ships, the industrial base today lacks sufficient non-Chinese rare-earth metals, metals-to-magnet capacity, and heavy-REE supply.

A Taiwan conflict would therefore be not only a war over geography but a war over supply-chain sovereignty. China’s volume advantage flows from materials control → manufacturing density → faster iteration → cheaper replenishment → sustained operational tempo. No number of Ford-class carriers can offset a structural deficit in the magnet and munitions ecosystem.

Investor Takeaway: Industrial Policy Is National Security

Today’s Telegraph highlights the symptoms; the materials sector reveals the cause. Expect further U.S. and allied urgency: magnet price-floor contracts, new Defense Production Act and DoD funding rounds, emergency stockpiling, and expanded friend-shoring with partners such as Australia, Japan, and the EU. If Taiwan is a flashpoint, rare earths are the fuse wire.

© 2025 Rare Earth Exchanges™Accelerating Transparency, Accuracy, and Insight Across the Rare Earth & Critical Minerals Supply Chain.

Search
Recent Reex News

Crony Socialism-or National Security Triage? The WSJ May Be Underestimating the Emergency

From Odisha’s Sands to Global Supply Chains: India’s Rare Earth Bet and the Challenges Ahead

The Manufacturing Comeback Won't Look Like 1952-and That's the Point

Supra Launches to Recover Gallium and Scandium From Waste - Promising Chemistry, Early-Stage Risk

Wall Street Bets on a “White House Put” for Rare Earths ? Investors Should Still Read the Fine Print

By Daniel

Inspired to launch Rare Earth Exchanges in part due to his lifelong passion for geology and mineralogy, and patriotism, to ensure America and free market economies develop their own rare earth and critical mineral supply chains.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.

Straight Into Your Inbox

Straight Into Your Inbox

Receive a Daily News Update Intended to Help You Keep Pace With the Rapidly Evolving REE Market.

Fantastic! Thanks for subscribing, you won't regret it.