Could Chinese Export Controls Give Wyoming’s Rare Earth Industry a Competitive Edge?

Highlights

  • China’s export restrictions on rare earth elements are creating potential opportunities for U.S. rare earth mining projects, particularly in Wyoming.
  • Domestic rare earth companies see potential for developing supply chains as global market dynamics shift due to trade tensions.
  • The U.S. remains years away from a fully integrated rare earth supply chain, but strategic investments could yield future competitive advantages.

Chinese export restrictions on rare earth elements—imposed in response to President Donald Trump’s tariff escalation—are stirring cautious optimism among U.S.-based mining ventures, particularly in Wyoming.

Leo Wolfson, writing for Cowboy State Daily (opens in a new tab), suggests that these restrictions could help accelerate the viability of rare earth development projects such as American Rare Earths’ Halleck Creek deposit and Rare Element Resources’ processing demonstration plant in Upton.

Citing Melissa Sanderson of American Rare Earths and Paul Bonifas of Rare Element Resources, the report outlines how China’s move—especially its targeting of heavy rare earths like terbium and dysprosium—could limit global supply and raise prices, benefiting emerging domestic players in the long term. Both executives note that while their projects won’t reach commercial production for several years, sustained Chinese restrictions could give American companies a critical runway to mature their supply chains.

That said, the optimism must be tempered by reality. The U.S. remains years away from having a fully integrated rare earth supply chain. As Sanderson acknowledges, current domestic production and processing capacity is minimal, and American firms still rely on global imports for materials, equipment, and technologies that could also become subject to tariff complications. Moreover, the political unpredictability of global trade tensions, including the risk of escalation into a broader tariff war, injects significant uncertainty.

Despite these caveats, the central claim—that Chinese export controls may enhance the long-term competitiveness of Wyoming’s rare earth industry—is plausible. If restrictions persist and the U.S. can align policy, investment, and permitting around domestic production, the groundwork laid today in Wyoming could pay strategic dividends. However, this remains a high-stakes geopolitical gamble hinging on both foreign policy dynamics and industrial readiness.

As Rare Earth Exchanges continues to emphasize the need for the U.S. and allies to compete against China on the rare earth element and critical mineral front, major industrial policy considerations become front and center for the current administration. Upstream deregulation is not nearly sufficient. Midstream and downstream resilience become mission-critical.

Leo Wolfson. “Chinese Export Restrictions Could Help Wyoming’s Rare Earths Industry.” Cowboy State Daily. April 7, 2025.

Spread the word:

CATEGORIES: ,
  1. Rare Earths Investor Avatar
    Rare Earths Investor

    “The U.S. remains years away from having a fully integrated rare earth supply chain”.

    We find this statement oft’ seen in the media very interesting.

    What does ‘years away’ mean? Are we talking the traditional experts’ 10 to 15 years mine to endline production timetable?

    Ok, maybe apples to oranges but we would remind readers of the expert’s 10-year view on vaccine timelines. This was obliterated (by 90%) by the Trump US response to the existential COVID outbreak.

    Today, the Trump Admin’ is taking approaches to world trade and geopolitics not seen in 100 years (we don’t care if one loves or hates him, just acknowledging his impact). Do we think the US (Defense Complex) machine will allow such traditional metals’ chain thinking to reign?

    We have wars being supplied by the USDC in Europe. Middle East and West Asia. Then, we have potential conflicts involving Iran, North Korea and China/Taiwan. Again, we ask, do we think that we are talking into the mid to late 2030s before we see significant competition with China for RE value chain diversification? As RE retail investors this is what we are looking for (with potential events and action driving policy, maybe not the best approach but pragmatic).

    The intention was/is not to become number one but competitive with China. To supply US/ROW on/reshoring with the connective chains required to support endline production. To the US the money needed is nothing and timelines are traditional thinking (again, if we haven’t seen the end of much of that approach since 2020 then guess we have all been asleep).

    We are witnessing existential changes in trade and geopolitical stances globally. To apply past decades’ thinking to potential outcomes today is, IOHO, limiting; particularly for niche RE investors this decade.

    Yes, changes will be messy and most RE wannabees will be unsuccessful (based on past events even some of those strategically supported will flounder). However, we would suggest that RE retail investors thinking that they have into the 2030s to make investment decisions based on experts’ opinions of the past re., funding, timelines connective off-takes, and needed intellectual knowledges and skills, etc., are not looking at what/who is involved in these potential chain developments today; particularly, what is now at stake!

    Oh yes, RE retail investors need to be very careful in their ongoing and selective DD, but the opportunities are there and coming. Likewise, so may be the disasters that befell many investors who rushed headlong into the 2010 bubble (yep, we did on a couple of ‘investments’); 2025 could be worse.

    So much more could be said. JOHO as usual. GLTA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *