Yet Another Misleading Media Take on Rare Earth Opportunities and Potential – Focus on Upstream-But Problems Midstream and Downstream

Highlights

  • University of Texas study reveals $8.4 billion worth of rare earth elements in U.S. coal ash reserves.
  • Approximately 70% of coal ash deposits in Appalachian, Illinois, and Powder River Basins are potentially accessible.
  • Current extraction technology is developing.
  • The U.S. lacks downstream processing capabilities to fully compete with China.

A recent article in the International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, summarized by Andy Hall writing for MSNreports (opens in a new tab) on a University of Texas-led study led by geologist Bridget Scanlon (opens in a new tab) that explores the potential for extracting rare earth elements (REEs) from legacy coal ash deposits in the U.S. With global demand for critical minerals expected to surge due to the clean energy transition, the U.S. could tap into an estimated $8.4 billion worth of REEs in its coal ash reserves, particularly from the Appalachian, Illinois, and Powder River Basins. The researchers estimate that about 70% of these deposits are potentially accessible, though current extraction yields remain modest, and technology is still developing.

While the article shines light on an important upstream opportunity—recovering REEs from coal ash—it largely ignores the midstream and downstream challenges that have historically undermined U.S. competitiveness in the rare earth supply chain. Extracting REEs from coal ash may be a promising step, but it’s only the first in a complex chain. The U.S. still lacks the domestic capacity to separate, refine, alloy, and manufacture REE-based components, which are stages currently dominated by China. U.S. coal ash extraction would merely export raw material vulnerabilities downstream without significant investment in refining, metallization, and magnet manufacturing.

Conclusion

This report commits a familiar analytical error: focusing on the abundance of feedstock (coal ash) without addressing the processing bottlenecks or market viability constraints. If the U.S. is to reduce its dependence on China and truly compete in the rare earth sector, it must build the full supply chain—from mine (or ash pile) to magnet. Otherwise, promising upstream potential will remain just that: potential.

Spread the word:

CATEGORIES: , , , ,

2 responses to “Yet Another Misleading Media Take on Rare Earth Opportunities and Potential – Focus on Upstream-But Problems Midstream and Downstream”

  1. Rare Earths Investor Avatar

    Agreed, obtaining future RE feedstock is not the issue for the US, whether your focus is on traditional digging of holes, coal waste extraction or bio mining, etc. Even if you are vexed by hyped up basic research claims along with actual present permitting timelines and the potential legal obstacles in the US, you still have a variety of feedstock opportunities in North and South America, plus AUS and maybe Africa, etc.

    We would also suggest that RE processing is less of an issue for the US with 4 already strategically backed wannabees in line. Even RE magnet making is arriving with two major ROW makers looking to build in the US and a private, strategically backed magnet recycler already producing (not talking here about a recent SPAC).

    The issue is who is going to fill that alloy/metals producing stage for a US RE value chain? Seems e.g., that MP has solved that issue for its mine to magnet chain and at least one AUS metals wannabee claims to be in US talks.

    We will see. GLTA – REI

  2. Daniel O'Connor Avatar
    Daniel O’Connor

    As always REI appreciate your wisdom and insight. First agreed on general points you make. The details of execution (“who is going to fill that alloy/metals producing stage) may be more complicated than we think. If China continues to use state backed entities to flood market and make it difficult to make money in traditional way then the industrial policy may be required–e.g. state on our end has to come in and underwrite in case private investment not capable of taking on such risk. I would appreciate your thoughts on that topic.

Leave a Reply to Rare Earths Investor Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *