Highlights

• The Trump-Xi rare earth accord suspends China's export controls for one year but leaves April 2025 licensing requirements intact, maintaining Beijing's regulatory control over supply chains.
• U.S. and European allies lack operational separation capacity for heavy rare earths and remain dependent on Chinese-processed oxides, even in defense applications.
• Energy Secretary Chris Wright advocates for 'non-market' tactics to counter China's grip, signaling Washington's recognition that real industrial policy is needed beyond diplomatic pauses.

---

Frankly, this seems to be a pause that pretends to protect.  One recent op-ed calls the Trump–Xi rare earth accord “time-buying, not security-building”—and they’re right. The so-called reprieve merely suspends Beijing’s October export-control edict for one year. Washington may claim a diplomatic win, but the machinery of dependency still hums beneath the surface. The April 2025 Ministry of Commerce rules, which require export-licensing and disclosure of product end-use, remain in force. That means any “reprieve” still passes through China’s regulatory gatekeepers. The faucet hasn’t been removed—only half-closed.

What’s Real and What’s Rhetoric

The InvestorNews Op-ed by Tracy Hughes accurately captures the mood: the deal eased short-term supply jitters but left structural vulnerability untouched. Jack Lifton’s warning—that the U.S. and Europe must urgently develop magnet-grade rare earth manufacturing—is grounded in the industrial reality that Rare Earth Exchanges (REEx) continuously supports. Beijing’s 2026–2030 Five-Year Plan doubles down on domestic value-addition, not export liberalization. Malaysia’s continued export ban, coupled with Lynas’ Malaysian expansion, underscores that Asia’s mid-stream dominance remains intact. The G7 Critical Minerals Alliance, while symbolically bold, lacks the cohesive funding and permitting speed to rival China’s vertically integrated juggernaut.

Reading Between the Lines

The InvestorNews piece tilts pragmatic, not alarmist, yet its optimism about Western coordination feels premature. It calls the truce “a recalibration,” but recalibration only matters if the compass works. The U.S. still lacks operational separation capacity for heavy rare earths and continues to rely on Chinese-processed oxides even in defense supply chains, if not via gray markets. In that light, the Kuala Lumpur deal buys breathing space (time?) for investors, not autonomy for policymakers.

The Copper Contrast

While rare earths linger in geopolitics, copper’s record surge tells a different story: markets reward tangible infrastructure and transparent demand. Copper’s rise to $12,000 per tonne signals that real-world electrification, not diplomatic ceremony, drives value.

The Bottom Line

InvestorNews gets the broad strokes right—this is a pause, not peace. But calling it strategic breathing room may overstate the control Washington has reclaimed. Until U.S. producers escape Beijing’s April 4 licensing labyrinth, the “reprieve” is little more than a silk ribbon on an iron lock.  The USA will not accomplish this without real industrial policy—we are not there, yet Washington DC may be starting to get it. Energy Secretary Chris Wright went on the record that USA, Canada and other allies will need “non-market” tactics to counter China’s rare earth grip.

Also see Tracy Hughes’ InvestorNews. (opens in a new tab)

©!-- /wp:paragraph -->