Highlights
- China dominates critical minerals not just through bribery tolerance but via a state-backed ecosystem combining financing, infrastructure, and guaranteed downstream demand.
- FCPA enforcement and compliance friction reduce Western investment in high-corruption jurisdictions by up to 24%, giving rivals a structural advantage in securing strategic assets.
- Case studies in Guinea, DRC, and Myanmar show how regulatory asymmetry and capital gaps let Chinese firms absorb critical mineral assets that U.S. companies identified but could not secure.
- The Minerals Security Partnership and revised DOJ FCPA guidelines signal Washington recognizes the problem, but prosecutorial discretion alone cannot close a structural execution gap.
- Winning in Great Powers Era 2.0 requires turning geology into a transaction and a transaction into a full supply chain, including refining, infrastructure, and host-country value-chain development.
0 Comments
No replies yet
Loading new replies...
Moderator
Join the full discussion at the Rare Earth Exchanges Forum →